首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists >Superpave Design Compaction Effort: Validity of Using Density at the End of Service Life as Parameter to Define N-Design
【24h】

Superpave Design Compaction Effort: Validity of Using Density at the End of Service Life as Parameter to Define N-Design

机译:Superpave设计压实工作:在使用寿命结束时使用密度作为定义N-设计的参数的有效性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

When the Superpave method of mix design was introduced in 1993, the method included a new Superpave gyratory compactor and a table of design compaction effort based on the premise that density in the laboratory compactor should match density at the end of service life. The experiment underpinning the N-design was done on pavements at least 12 years old. Post SHRP attempts to expand that database to include pavements of all ages and refine the table of design compaction have been unsuccessful and lead to the conclusion that density at the end of service life is not a reasonable parameter to define design compaction. The Superpave Mixtures and Aggregates Expert Task Group have recommended changes to the original design compaction. These are based on compactability of the aggregate skeleton to changes in N-design and on changes in mixture stiffness with changes in N-design. Change to the design compaction level (N-design) does not change asphalt content, it changes mixture mechanical properties (stiffness). Current levels of N-design in the Superpave system are rational and reasonable.
机译:当Superpave混合设计方法于1993年推出时,该方法包括一个新的Superpave旋转压实机和一张表设计压实工作量,其前提是实验室压实机中的密度应与使用寿命结束时的密度相匹配。 N设计的实验是在至少12年以上的人行道上进行的。 SHRP后试图扩展该数据库以包括所有年龄的路面并优化设计压实表一直没有成功,并得出了这样的结论:使用寿命结束时的密度不是定义设计压实的合理参数。 Superpave混合料和骨料专家任务组建议对原始设计压实度进行更改。这些是基于骨料骨架对N型设计变化的可压缩性以及基于N型设计变化的混合刚度的变化。更改为设计压实度(N-design)不会更改沥青含量,它会更改混合物的机械性能(刚度)。 Superpave系统中当前的N设计水平是合理的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号