首页> 外文期刊>ASHRAE Transactions >Occupancy of Australian Office Buildings: How Accurate Are Typical Assumptions Used in Energy Performance Simulation and What is the Impact of Inaccuracy
【24h】

Occupancy of Australian Office Buildings: How Accurate Are Typical Assumptions Used in Energy Performance Simulation and What is the Impact of Inaccuracy

机译:澳大利亚办公大楼的使用情况:能源绩效模拟中使用的典型假设的准确性如何以及不准确的影响是什么

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study investigates the impact of occupancy assumptions on the accuracy of simulated energy performance of Australian office buildings in the design stage. The first part of this paper will present the results of occupancy surveys of a limited number of Australian office buildings performed by the author.The second part of the paper utilises the data from the occupancy surveys to quantify the difference between the predicted energy performance of buildings using a range of values for occupancy based on the surveys and the predicted energy performance of the same building models using the National Australian Built Environment Rating System (NABERS) occupancy assumptions. The study aims to determine if use of the NABERS assumptions causes significant distortions in modelled energy performance.
机译:这项研究调查在设计阶段占用假设对澳大利亚办公楼模拟能源性能准确性的影响。本文的第一部分将介绍作者对澳大利亚数量有限的办公楼进行的占用调查的结果。第二部分利用占用调查的数据来量化预测的建筑物能源性能之间的差异。根据调查以及使用澳大利亚国家建筑环境评级系统(NABERS)占用假设的相同建筑模型的预测能源性能,使用一系列占用值。这项研究旨在确定使用NABERS假设是否会导致建模的能源绩效出现重大失真。

著录项

  • 来源
    《ASHRAE Transactions》 |2012年第1期|p.217-224|共8页
  • 作者

    Aileen Marie (Annie) Egan;

  • 作者单位

    College of Engineering and Computer Science, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号