首页> 外文期刊>American Sociological Review >Movements, Aesthetics, and Markets in Literary Change: Making the American Labor Problem Novel
【24h】

Movements, Aesthetics, and Markets in Literary Change: Making the American Labor Problem Novel

机译:文学变革中的运动,美学和市场:使美国劳工问题新颖

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

One path to cultural innovation in artistic and literary fields is differentiation of a genre into new subgenres. But what are the dynamics at work in such a process? This article addresses that question by identifying and explaining the emergence and trajectory of a new fiction subgenre-the American labor problem novel-during the late-nineteenth and early-twentieth centuries. I make a theoretical case for the intersection of social movement fields and cultural production fields showing, through a historical sociological analysis, that this subgenre was the joint product of: (1) a shift in literary aesthetic practice resulting from the rise of realism, (2) the subgenre's dialogical character, (3) collective contention surrounding the rise of labor movement militancy, and (4) the exigencies of literary and popular culture markets. The historical conjuncture of these processes contributed to a repository of cultural constructions of class in storied form, as novelists sought to both entertain and educate readers about the emerging realities of class-contentious industrial society. This study demonstrates the fruitfulness of merging sociology of culture theory and social movement outcome perspectives when analyzing cultural change. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]
机译:在艺术和文学领域进行文化创新的一条途径是将一种类型分化为新的子类型。但是,在此过程中,有什么动态作用?本文通过识别和解释一种新的小说亚类(美国的劳动问题小说)的出现和轨迹来解决该问题,该小说在19世纪末至20世纪初就出现了。我对社会运动领域和文化生产领域的交集进行了理论分析,通过历史社会学分析表明,该子流派是以下方面的共同产物:(1)由于现实主义的兴起,文学美学实践发生了转变,( 2)子流派的对话特征,(3)围绕工人运动好战势头兴起的集体争论,以及(4)文学和大众文化市场的迫切需求。这些过程的历史转折点促成了一个以故事形式出现的阶级文化构造的资料库,因为小说家们试图娱乐和教育读者关于有阶级争议的工业社会的新兴现实。这项研究表明,在分析文化变迁时,将文化理论的社会学与社会运动的成果观点相融合是富有成果的。 [出版物摘要]

著录项

  • 来源
    《American Sociological Review》 |2009年第6期|p.938-965|共28页
  • 作者

    Larry Isaac;

  • 作者单位

    Larry IsaacVanderbilt UniversityDirect correspondence to Larry Isaac (larry.isaac@vanderbilt.edu). This project was supported, in part, by the College of Arts and Science, Vanderbilt University and benefited from two National Endowment for the Humanities grants (FT44785-00 and FA-54049-08). The views expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of the NEH or Vanderbilt University. Previous versions of this article were presented at American Sociological Association Meetings, Vanderbilt University Department of Sociology "Power, Politics, and Social Movements" Colloquium, European Sociological Association Meetings, Glasgow-Caledonia University, Scotland, 2007, and the Interdisciplinary Speaker Series for Departments of Sociology, History, & English, University of Tennessee, 2007. For useful comments and suggestions at various stages of this project, I thank participants of the above venues, and especially Judy Isaac, Jennifer Lena, Richard Peterson, Cecelia Tichi, Alan Trachtenberg, and Janet Zandy. Noel Austin, Soma Chaudhuri, Dan Morrison, and bibliographers at Vanderbilt University, especially Sue Erickson, provided research assistance. I am grateful to the ASR reviewers and editors for valuable comments and suggestions, and to Mara Grynaviski for copyediting.Larry Isaac is Distinguished Professor of Sociology and Affiliate Professor of American Studies, Vanderbilt University. He has published numerous articles on social movements, politics, historical sociology, and social change, including "How the Civil Rights Movement Revitalized Labor Militancy " (with Lars Christiansen in American Sociological Reviewj, "Talán 'it from the Streets: How the Sixties Mass Movement Revitalized Unionization " (with Steve McDonald and Greg Lukasik in American Journal of Sociology,), and "Movement of Movements: Culture Moves in the Long Civil Rights Struggle " (in Social Forces/ He is currently working on two major projects: a study of the Nashville civil rights movement in the late 1950s to early 1960s (with Dan Cornfield, Dennis Dickerson, and James Lawson) and a National Endowment for the Humanities-funded study of the political culture of private elite militias in Gilded Age America. He is also an incoming editor of the American Sociological Review.,;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号