首页> 外文期刊>Architecture Australia >Indigenizing practice: To award, or not to award?
【24h】

Indigenizing practice: To award, or not to award?

机译:伊妥化实践:奖励,或不奖励?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

As the architecture profession engages more and more with Indigenous peoples across Australia, we are seeing an increase in projects labelled "Indigenous architecture" entered into awards programs. However, the current Australian Institute of Architects awards system and its assessment criteria weren't necessarily written to account for Indigenous engagement, perspectives and approaches to design. As a result, we risk awarding projects for which the engagement process or outcomes may not be appropriate in the eyes of the Indigenous community representatives who were engaged on the projects. This is especially problematic because awarded projects sit on the permanent record of what we collectively consider and portray to the world as precedents of "good design." Here, a diverse range of Indigenous and non-Indigenous practitioners and awards convenors, as well as our Maori colleagues, respond to questions about awarding Indigenous architecture.
机译:随着澳大利亚的土着人民从事澳大利亚的土着人民越来越多地,我们看到有标有“土着建筑”的项目增加,进入奖项计划。然而,目前澳大利亚建筑师协会奖励制度及其评估标准不一定写入本土参与,观点和设计方法。因此,我们冒险授予订婚过程或结果的项目可能不适合从事项目的土着社区代表的眼中。这尤其有问题,因为授予的项目坐在我们集体考虑和描绘世界的永久记录,作为“良好设计”的先例。在这里,各种各样的土着和非土着从业者和奖项召集人以及我们的毛利同事,回应了关于授予土着建筑的问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号