首页> 外文期刊>The Architectural Review >Neon crisis in Hong Kong
【24h】

Neon crisis in Hong Kong

机译:香港霓虹灯危机

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

When 19-year-old Kwong Ming was caught in Queen's Road Central with a neon sign in his possession, he admitted lifting it from a shop entrance. With no inquiry into motive, English-language reports on this 1947 larceny case repeated the magistrate's ruling: Kwong was expelled from Hong Kong because 'shopkeepers must be protected from such thieves'. Postwar Hong Kong was still recovering from the Japanese Occupation, which left the British colony's electricity system impaired, and suspended the use of neon just 15 years after its first neon factory opened. Commercially valued and symbolically charged, neon roused passions, perils and desires. Damage, either infrastructural or to a single sign, could have led to the theft, but fear over the Communist challenge to mainland Nationalist rule transcended compassion.
机译:当19岁的广角队在皇后的道路中占据了霓虹灯中的众议院时,他承认从商店入口举起。 没有询问动机,1947年的英语报告盗窃案案例重复了裁判官的裁决:郭某被驱逐出香港,因为“店主必须受到保护的保护”。 邮局香港仍然从日本职业中恢复过来,使不列颠殖民地的电力系统受损,并暂停在第一个霓虹灯工厂开业后的15年即可使用霓虹灯。 商业价值和象征性地充电,霓虹灯激动的激情,危险和欲望。 损坏,无论是基础设施还是单一的标志,都可能导致盗窃,但担心与内地民族主义规则过渡同情的共产党挑战。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号