首页> 外文期刊>IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity >Comparative Study of Permanent Magnet Assisted Linear Switched Reluctance Motor and Linear Flux Switching Permanent Magnet Motor for Railway Transportation
【24h】

Comparative Study of Permanent Magnet Assisted Linear Switched Reluctance Motor and Linear Flux Switching Permanent Magnet Motor for Railway Transportation

机译:永磁辅助线性开关磁阻电动机和线性通量切换永磁电动机的比较研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Linear switched reluctance motor (LSRM) has been investigated and supposed as a good candidate in railway system. Recently, permanent magnet assisted switched reluctance motor (PMA-SRM) has attracted extensive attention because of the high torque, robust structure and low cost. However, all these researches focus on the application of small air gaps. How does PMA-SRM perform in large air gap? No research has been conducted until now. As we know, there are many similarities between linear flux switching permanent magnet (LFSPM) motor and permanent magnet assisted linear switched reluctance motor (PMA-LSRM) such as similar primary iron, winding structure, robust secondary and a small amount of permanent magnets. In this case, what are the similarities and differences between these two kinds of motors in terms of electromagnetic characteristics? This paper will compare these two kinds of motors based on the volume of rail transit from the following aspects: thrust force, thrust ripple, efficiency. First, the topology, operation principle of the two LSRMs are introduced and designed. Then, the electromagnetic performance of LSRM is optimized through two dimensional finite element analysis (FEA) based on ANSYS software. The optimization objectives of PMA-LSRM are to maximize the thrust and to minimize the ripple at the given dimensions and the rated condition. The comparison of electromagnetic characteristics between LFSPM motor and PMA-LSRM is completed. Finally, it is concluded that the permanent magnets are not conducive to improving the power of LSRM. And the PMA-LSRM is not outstanding compared with LFSPM motor under the condition of large air gap for rail transit.
机译:已经研究了线性开关磁阻电机(LSRM)并认为是铁路系统的良好候选者。最近,永磁辅助开​​关磁阻电机(PMA-SRM)由于高扭矩,鲁棒结构和低成本,因此引起了广泛的关注。然而,所有这些研究都侧重于小空气差距的应用。 PMA-SRM如何在大型气隙中进行?直到现在没有研究。如我们所知,线性通量开关永磁体(LFSPM)电机和永磁辅助线性开关磁阻电动机(PMA-LSRM)之间存在许多相似之处,例如类似的初级铁,绕组结构,鲁棒次级和少量永磁体。在这种情况下,在电磁特性方面这两种电动机之间的相似性和差异是什么?本文将根据以下几个方面的轨道传输量进行比较这两种电机:推力,推力波动,效率。首先,拓扑,推出和设计了两个LSRMS的操作原理。然后,通过基于ANSYS软件的二维有限元分析(FEA)优化LSRM的电磁性能。 PMA-LSRM的优化目标是最大化推力,并最小化给定尺寸和额定条件的纹波。完成LFSPM电机和PMA-LSRM之间的电磁特性的比较。最后,得出结论,永磁体不利于提高LSRM的力量。与LFSPM电机在轨道交通的大空气间隙条件下,PMA-LSRM不发言。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号