首页> 外文期刊>Applied Energy >Incorporating health co-benefits into regional carbon emission reduction policy making: A case study of China's power sector
【24h】

Incorporating health co-benefits into regional carbon emission reduction policy making: A case study of China's power sector

机译:将健康共同利益纳入区域碳减排政策制定中:以中国电力行业为例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

How to maximize the synergies between CO2 and conventional air pollutants (CAP) emission reductions have been extensively discussed in previous studies. However, few studies have explored the essential policy concern, which is, how to maximize the social benefits including both carbon mitigation and human health co-benefits from the co-abated conventional air pollutants. Besides, for some sectors that have extensive inter-regional trade, using more low-carbon technologies to produce goods (and thus reducing its own CO2 emissions) in one region may influence the need of goods imported from another region and consequently the associated conventional air pollutants emissions. Therefore, the health co-benefits may also be transferred to the other regions. This transfer effect has seldom been quantified before. To bridge these research gaps, this paper took China's power sector as an example and quantified the operating margin (OM) emission factors of SO2, NOX and PM2.5 in China's six power grids. Then the co-abatement rates of these three pollutants when reducing each kiloton of CO2 in different grids were calculated. Finally, considering different grids' meteorological conditions, population densities, baseline incidences, baseline death rates, and the inter-grid electricity trade, this paper computed and compared the values and regional distribution of health co-benefits per kiloton of CO2 reduced. It is found that grids with the highest co-abatement rates in conventional air pollutants do not necessarily bring maximum health cobenefits. Although the northeast grid could achieve the largest co-reduction in NOX and PM2.5, it is the south grid that has the largest health co-benefits. The differences in health co-benefits of the same amount of CO2 reduced among grids vary as much as fivefold. Besides, the share of trans-grid health co-benefits can be as high as 14.1% if CO2 reduction takes place in the east grid. Therefore, it is suggested that the health co-benefits of CO2 reduction and their trans-regional distribution should be taken seriously when making regional carbon emission reduction plans, in order to maximize the social benefits of CO2 reduction.
机译:在先前的研究中已经广泛讨论了如何最大程度地减少二氧化碳与常规空气污染物(CAP)排放之间的协同作用。但是,很少有研究探索基本的政策关注点,即如何最大程度地减少共同污染的常规空气污染物带来的社会效益,包括减少碳排放和人类健康的共同利益。此外,对于一些区域间贸易广泛的行业,在一个地区使用更多的低碳技术生产商品(从而减少自身的二氧化碳排放量)可能会影响从另一地区进口商品的需求,从而影响相关的常规航空污染物排放。因此,健康的共同利益也可能转移到其他地区。这种转移效应以前很少被量化。为了弥补这些研究差距,本文以中国的电力行业为例,对中国六个电网中SO2,NOX和PM2.5的运营边际(OM)排放因子进行了量化。然后计算了减少不同网格中每千吨二氧化碳排放量时这三种污染物的协同减排率。最后,考虑到不同电网的气象条件,人口密度,基线发生率,基线死亡率和电网间电力贸易,本文计算并比较了每减少一千克二氧化碳所产生的健康共同效益的价值和区域分布。发现在常规空气污染物中具有最高协同减排率的网格并不一定带来最大的健康协同效益。尽管东北网格可以最大程度地减少NOX和PM2.5的协同排放,但南部网格具有最大的健康协同效益。网格之间相同二氧化碳减少量的健康共同效益的差异高达五倍。此外,如果在东部电网减少二氧化碳排放,跨电网健康共同收益的份额可能高达14.1%。因此,建议在制定区域碳减排计划时应认真考虑减少二氧化碳的健康共同利益及其跨区域分布,以最大程度地减少二氧化碳的社会效益。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Applied Energy》 |2019年第1期|113498.1-113498.9|共9页
  • 作者单位

    Tsinghua Univ Minist Educ Key Lab Earth Syst Modeling Dept Earth Syst Sci Beijing 100084 Peoples R China|Tsinghua Univ Tsinghua Rio Tinto Joint Res Ctr Resources Energy Beijing 100084 Peoples R China|Joint Ctr Global Change Studies Beijing 100085 Peoples R China|Tsinghua Univ Hlth City Res Ctr Inst China Sustainable Urbanizat Beijing 100084 Peoples R China;

    Tsinghua Univ State Key Joint Lab Environm Simulat & Pollut Con Beijing 100084 Peoples R China|Tsinghua Univ Sch Environm Beijing 100084 Peoples R China;

    State Grid Corp China State Grid Energy Res Inst Beijing 102209 Peoples R China;

    Tsinghua Univ Minist Educ Key Lab Earth Syst Modeling Dept Earth Syst Sci Beijing 100084 Peoples R China|Joint Ctr Global Change Studies Beijing 100085 Peoples R China;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Co-abatement rates; Health co-benefits; Transfer effect; Carbon emission reduction policy making; Power sector;

    机译:共同减排率;健康共同利益;转移效果;碳减排政策制定;电力部门;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号