...
首页> 外文期刊>Applied Economics >Economics training and hyperbolic discounting: training versus selection effects
【24h】

Economics training and hyperbolic discounting: training versus selection effects

机译:经济学培训和双曲线折扣:培训与选择效果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

This paper contributes to the literature on the effects of economics training on behavior by examining the link between hyperbolic discounting and the number of economics classes taken by a sample of 1310 college graduates at Ohio University. A strong negative correlation is found between economics training and hyperbolic discounting behavior. Regression analysis shows that dynamic consistency is a determinant of taking economics classes. Once the endogeneity of these variables is accounted for, economics training is no longer a statistically significant determinant of hyperbolic discounting. Thus, the selection effect of studying economics outweighs the training effect. Behavioral variables are found to be more important in explaining hyperbolic discounting than demographic variables. The study suggests the importance of controlling for both the selection effect and the training effect for all studies that examine the role of economic training on behavior.
机译:本文有助于通过在俄亥俄州大学1310名大学毕业生样本审查双曲线折扣和经济学课程之间的联系,有助于经济学培训对行为的影响。经济学培训与双曲线折扣行为之间存在强烈的负相关。回归分析表明,动态一致性是采取经济学课程的决定因素。一旦占这些变量的内部性性,经济学培训不再是双曲贴现的统计学意义的决定因素。因此,研究经济学的选择效果超过了训练效果。发现行为变量在解释双曲线折扣而不是人口变量更重要。该研究表明,控制选择效应和培训效果的重要性,以研究经济培训对行为的作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号