首页> 外文期刊>Applied Cognitive Psychology >Working memory interference during processing texts and pictures: Implications for the explanation of the modality effect
【24h】

Working memory interference during processing texts and pictures: Implications for the explanation of the modality effect

机译:处理文本和图片期间的工作记忆干扰:对模态效应的解释含义

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Auditory text presentation improves learning with pictures and texts. With sequential text–picture presentation, cognitive models of multimedia learning explain this modality effect in terms of greater visuo-spatial working memory load with visual as compared to auditory texts. Visual texts are assumed to demand the same working memory subsystem as pictures, while auditory texts make use of an additional cognitive resource. We provide two alternative assumptions that relate to more basic processes: First, acoustic-sensory information causes a retention advantage for auditory over visual texts which occurs no matter if a picture is presented or not. Second, eye movements during reading hamper visuo-spatial rehearsal. Two experiments applying elementary procedures provide first evidence for these assumptions. Experiment 1 demonstrates that, regarding text recall, the auditory advantage is independent of visuo-spatial working memory load. Experiment 2 reveals worse matrix recognition performance after reading text requiring eye movements than after listening or reading without eye movements. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
机译:听觉文本表示可以提高图片和文本的学习效果。通过顺序的文本图片呈现,多媒体学习的认知模型可以通过比听觉文本更大的视觉视觉空间工作记忆负荷来解释这种模态效应。假定视觉文本需要与图片相同的工作记忆子系统,而听觉文本则使用了额外的认知资源。我们提供了两个与更基本的过程有关的替代假设:首先,与是否显示图片相比,声觉信息在听觉上比视觉文本具有保留优势。其次,阅读过程中的眼球运动妨碍了视觉空间的排练。两项应用基本程序的实验为这些假设提供了第一个证据。实验1证明,关于文本回忆,听觉优势与视觉空间工作记忆负荷无关。实验2表明,阅读需要眼动的文本后的矩阵识别性能要比不听眼或不动眼的阅读后矩阵识别性能差。版权所有©2008 John Wiley&Sons,Ltd.

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号