首页> 外文期刊>Anthropology Today >Explaining away same-sex sexualities
【24h】

Explaining away same-sex sexualities

机译:解释同性性行为

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

In a series of ethnological volumes on homosexualities - African, Central and South American, Muslim and and Oceanic - I have culled literature by anthropologists and by other visitors to and residents of many societies. Below, I am going to embark on a whirlwind tour of the world, but I want to begin with an even briefer (and even more America-centered) historical overview. Boas's students and their students, the first two generations trained as cultural anthropologists, briefly noted gender variant roles, and like earlier and other Euro-American observers, fitted the phenomena into whatever notions were prominent in their own culture. Early on, this meant treating gender and/or sexual variance as instances of 'hermaphrodites'. That categorization was followed by Freudian, feminist, rebel-romanticizing, New Age spiritualist and other projections. Although some anthropologists endeavoured to explain 'niches' for 'deviants' during the 1930s, others 'defended' what they considered 'their people' from the charge of engaging in or accepting 'homosexuality'.
机译:在一系列关于同性恋的民族学著作中(非洲,中美洲和南美,穆斯林和海洋),我收集了人类学家以及许多社会人士和居民的文学作品。在下面,我将进行一次环球旋风之旅,但我想从更简短的(甚至更多以美国为中心)的历史概述开始。博阿斯(Boas)的学生和他们的学生是接受文化人类学家培训的前两代人,他们简短地指出了性别变异的作用,并且像早期的欧洲观察家和其他欧美观察家一样,将这种现象融入了他们本国文化中任何突出的观念。早期,这意味着将性别和/或性别差异视为“雌雄同体”的实例。紧随其后的是弗洛伊德主义,女权主义者,反叛浪漫主义者,新时代唯心主义者和其他预测。尽管有些人类学家努力在1930年代为“反常者”解释“利基”,但另一些人类学家则从参与或接受“同性恋”的角度“捍卫”了他们认为的“他们的人民”。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号