首页> 外文期刊>Annals of Hematology >(Bortezomib plus lenalidomide/thalidomide)- vs (bortezomib or lenalidomide/thalidomide)-containing regimens as induction therapy in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
【24h】

(Bortezomib plus lenalidomide/thalidomide)- vs (bortezomib or lenalidomide/thalidomide)-containing regimens as induction therapy in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

机译:(硼替佐米加来那度胺/沙利度胺)-与(硼替佐米或来那度胺/沙利度胺)方案在新诊断的多发性骨髓瘤中的诱导治疗:随机对照试验的荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The aim of the study was to perform a meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of (bortezomib plus lenalidomide/thalidomide)- vs (bortezomib or lenalidomide/thalidomide)-containing regimens as induction therapy in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. We searched electronic and printed sources for relevant articles published. Inclusion criteria was as follows: randomized controlled trials (RCT) of (bortezomib plus lenalidomide/thalidomide) vs (bortezomib or lenalidomide/thalidomide)-containing regimens as induction therapy in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Two reviewers independently assessed potentially eligible studies and extracted relevant data. We retrieved five RCT studies including a total of 1,200 patients. Using the random-effects model to pool the five RCT with a statistically significant heterogeneity (P = 0.03; X 2 = 10.69; df = 4; I 2 = 63 %), the weighted risk ratios of a complete response (CR) for (bortezomib plus lenalidomide/thalidomide)-containing regimens was 1.81 (P = 0.005; 95 % CI: 1.20–2.73). When we excluded the study by Cavo et al. (Lancet 376:2075–2085, 2010), the pooled risk ratio for CR was 1.59 (P < 0.0001, 95 %CI: 1.29–1.96) with no statistically significant heterogeneity (P = 0.54; X 2 = 2.14; df = 3; I 2 = 0 %) among four RCT under the fixed effects mode. The pooled odds ratio for the main grade III/IV adverse events (the peripheral neuropathy, thrombotic events, and infections) were 1.76 (P = 0.32; 95 % CI: 0.58–5.31), 0.92 (P = 0.76, 95 %CI: 0.52–1.61), and 1.05 (P = 0.82, 95 % CI: 0.70–1.57), respectively. Our analysis showed (bortezomib plus lenalidomide/thalidomide)-containing regimens as induction treatment in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma improved CR but did not increase the risk of major adverse events (the peripheral neuropathy, thrombotic events, and infections).
机译:该研究的目的是对(硼替佐米加来那度胺/沙利度胺)-含(硼替佐米或来那度胺/沙利度胺)方案作为诱导疗法在新诊断的多发性骨髓瘤中的疗效和安全性进行荟萃分析。我们在电子和印刷资源中搜索了发表的相关文章。纳入标准如下:(硼替佐米加来那度胺/沙利度胺)与(硼替佐米或来那度胺/沙利度胺)方案作为诱导疗法在新诊断的多发性骨髓瘤中的随机对照试验(RCT)。两名审稿人独立评估了可能符合条件的研究并提取了相关数据。我们检索了五项RCT研究,包括总共1200名患者。使用随机效应模型合并具有统计学显着异质性的五个RCT(P = 0.03; X 2 = 10.69; df = 4; I 2 = 63%) ,含(硼替佐米加来那度胺/沙利度胺)方案的完全缓解(CR)的加权风险比为1.81(P = 0.005; 95%CI:1.20-2.73)。当我们排除了Cavo等人的研究时。 (柳叶刀376:2075–2085,2010),合并CR的风险比为1.59(P <0.0001,95%CI:1.29–1.96),无统计学差异(P = 0.54; X 2 = 2.14; df = 3; I 2 = 0%)在固定效果模式下的四个RCT中。主要的III / IV级不良事件(周围神经病变,血栓形成事件和感染)的合并优势比为1.76(P = 0.32; 95%CI:0.58–5.31),0.92(P = 0.76,95%CI:分别为0.52-1.61和1.05(P = 0.82,95%CI:0.70-1.57)。我们的分析表明,在新诊断的多发性骨髓瘤中采用(硼替佐米加来那度胺/沙利度胺)作为诱导治疗方案可改善CR,但并未增加主要不良事件(周围神经病变,血栓形成事件和感染)的风险。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号