首页> 外文期刊>Animal behaviour >Cooperation in rats playing the iterated Prisoner's Dilemma game
【24h】

Cooperation in rats playing the iterated Prisoner's Dilemma game

机译:在反复囚徒困境游戏中的老鼠合作

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Humans and animals show cooperative behaviour, but our understanding of cooperation among unrelated laboratory animals is limited. A classic test of cooperation is the iterated Prisoner's Dilemma (IPD) game, where two players receive varying payoffs for cooperation or defection in repeated trials. To determine whether unrelated rats cooperate in the IPD, we tested pairs of rats making operant responses to earn food reward in 25 trials/day. The operant chamber was bisected by a metal screen with a retractable lever and pellet dispenser on each side. When levers extended, rats had 2 s to respond. Mutual cooperation (Reward) delivered three pellets each, mutual defection (Punishment) provided no pellets, and unilateral defection (Temptation) gave five pellets to the defector, while the partner (Sucker) received none. In eight pairs of males (RM-) and females (RF-), cooperation was defined by withholding a response. In seven pairs of RM+ males, cooperation was defined by responding on the lever. In males, food restriction significantly inhibited both cooperation and pellets received. There was no effect of dominance status. Males and females made similar numbers of responses under ad libitum feeding. However, neither food restriction nor dominance status affected responses in females. Rats were subsequently tested for reciprocity in 24 alternating trials/day. A response on the lever within 5 s delivered three pellets to the partner. Females made significantly more responses for their cage-mate than males. Responses within pairs were significantly correlated for males, but not for females. For both sexes, responses declined significantly when paired with an unfamiliar partner who never reciprocated ('bad stooge'). These results demonstrate that rats working for food show cooperation in IPD and direct reciprocity. Their responses depend on food availability and responses of their partner. (C) 2016 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:人与动物表现出合作行为,但我们对无关的实验动物之间合作的了解有限。经典的合作测试是迭代的囚徒困境(IPD)游戏,其中两名玩家在反复试验中会因合作或叛逃而获得不同的回报。为了确定无亲缘关系的大鼠是否在IPD中合作,我们对每天进行25次试验的成对大​​鼠进行操作性反应以获取食物奖励进行了测试。操作室被金属筛网一分为二,金属筛网的每一侧都有可伸缩的杠杆和颗粒分配器。当杠杆伸出时,大鼠有2 s的响应时间。相互合作(奖励)提供了三个弹丸,互助叛逃(惩罚)没有提供弹丸,单边叛逃(诱惑)给叛逃者提供了五个弹丸,而伴侣(萨克)则没有。在八对男性(RM-)和女性(RF-)中,合作是通过拒绝回复来定义的。在七对RM +雄性中,通过对杠杆的响应来定义合作。在男性中,食物限制显着抑制了合作和接收颗粒。没有支配地位的影响。随意喂食时,雄性和雌性做出相似的反应。但是,食物限制和主导地位都不会影响女性的反应。随后在每天24次交替试验中对大鼠进行交互性测试。在5秒钟之内对控制杆的响应将三颗药丸发送给伙伴。女性对笼伴侣的反应明显多于男性。配对中的反应与男性显着相关,而与女性无关。对于两个性别,如果与一个从未交往的陌生伴侣配对(“臭气”),反应显着下降。这些结果表明,从事食物工作的老鼠在IPD和直接互惠方面表现出合作。他们的反应取决于食物的可获得性和伙伴的反应。 (C)2016动物行为研究协会。由Elsevier Ltd.出版。保留所有权利。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Animal behaviour》 |2016年第2016期|27-35|共9页
  • 作者单位

    Univ So Calif, Keck Sch Med, Dept Cell & Neurobiol, 1333 San Pablo St,BMT 401, Los Angeles, CA 90033 USA;

    Univ So Calif, Keck Sch Med, Dept Cell & Neurobiol, 1333 San Pablo St,BMT 401, Los Angeles, CA 90033 USA;

    Univ So Calif, Keck Sch Med, Dept Cell & Neurobiol, 1333 San Pablo St,BMT 401, Los Angeles, CA 90033 USA;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    animal; cooperation; food reward; game theory; sex characteristic;

    机译:动物;合作;食物奖励;博弈论;性别特征;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号