...
首页> 外文期刊>The American Journal of Psychiatry >Functional Co-Primary Measures for Clinical Trials in Schizophrenia: Results From the MATRICS Psychometric and Standardization Study
【24h】

Functional Co-Primary Measures for Clinical Trials in Schizophrenia: Results From the MATRICS Psychometric and Standardization Study

机译:精神分裂症临床试验的功能性共同主要措施:来自MATRICS心理测量和标准化研究的结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

During the consensus meetings of the National Institute of Mental Health Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (NIMH-MATRICS) Initiative, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration took the position that a drug for this purpose should show changes on 1) an accepted consensus cognitive performance measure and 2) an additional measure (i.e., a co-primary) that is considered functionally meaningful. The goal of the current study was to describe steps to evaluate four potential co-primary measures for psychometric properties and validity. As part of the five-site MATRICS Psychometric and Standardization Study (PASS), two measures of functional capacity and two interview-based measures of cognition were evaluated in 176 patients with schizophrenia (167 of these patients were retested 4 weeks later). Data are presented for each co-primary measure for test-retest reliability, utility as a repeated measure, relationship to cognitive performance, relationship to functioning, tolerability/practicality, and number of missing data. Psychometric properties of all of the measures were considered acceptable, and the measures were generally comparable across the various criteria, except that the functional capacity measures had stronger relationships to cognitive performance and fewer missing data. The development and evaluation of potential co-primary measures is still at an early stage, and it was decided not to endorse a single measure for clinical trials at this point. The current findings offer the initial steps to identify functionally meaningful co-primary measures in this area and will help to guide further evaluation of such measures.
机译:在美国国家精神卫生测量与治疗研究所(NIMH-MATRICS)倡议的共识会议上,美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)认为,用于此目的的药物应显示以下变化:1)接受共识性认知绩效指标和2)被认为在功能上有意义的其他指标(即共同主要指标)。当前研究的目的是描述评估心理计量学特性和有效性的四种潜在的共同主要措施的步骤。作为五个场所的MATRICS心理计量和标准化研究(PASS)的一部分,对176例精神分裂症患者的两项功能能力测评和两项基于面试的认知测评进行了评估(4周后重新测试了其中167例)。列出了每个共同主要指标的数据,包括重测信度,重复使用效用,与认知表现的关系,与功能的关系,耐受性/实用性以及丢失的数据数量。所有功能的心理测量特性均被认为是可以接受的,并且在各种标准下这些功能通常具有可比性,只是功能能力量度与认知表现的关系更强,丢失的数据更少。潜在的共同治疗措施的开发和评估仍处于早期阶段,因此决定不批准一项针对临床试验的措施。当前的发现提供了确定该领域在功能上有意义的共同主要措施的初始步骤,并将有助于指导对此类措施的进一步评估。

著录项

  • 来源
    《The American Journal of Psychiatry 》 |2008年第2期| p.221-228| 共8页
  • 作者单位

    Michael F. Green, Ph.D.Keith H. Nuechterlein, Ph.D.Robert S. Kern, Ph.D.Lyle E. Baade, Ph.D.Wayne S. Fenton, M.D.James M. Gold, Ph.D.Richard S.E. Keefe, Ph.D.Raquelle Mesholam-Gately, Ph.D.Larry J. Seidman, Ph.D.Ellen Stover, Ph.D.Stephen R. Marder, M.D.Received Jan. 13, 2007, revisions received July 6 and Aug. 12, 2007, accepted Aug. 16, 2007 (doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2007.07010089). From the Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior and the Department of Psychology, Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, the VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, the University of Kansas School of Medicine, Wichita, Kan., NIMH, Bethesda, Md., the Maryland Psychiatric Research Center, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University, Durham, N.C, the Public Psychiatry Division, Department of Psychiatry, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Massachusetts Mental Health Center, Boston, and the Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston. Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Green, Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, UCLA, 300 Medical Plaza, Rm. 2263, Los Angeles, CA 90095-6968, mgreen@ucla.edu (e-mail).Dr. Keefe has received funding from Abbot, AstraZeneca, Dainippon Sumitomo. Forest, Gabriel, GlaxoSmithKline, Memory, Otsuka, Pfizer, Repligen, Saegis, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Cephalon, Eli Lilly, Johnson & Johnson, Lundbeck, Merck, Orexigen, Sanofi-Aventis, Xenoport. He receives royalties from the Brief Assessment of Cognition and the MATRICS Battery. He has received grants from Organon, NIMH, Pfizer, Eli Lilly, and AstraZeneca. Dr. Green has consulted for Eli Lilly, Otsuka, Lundbeck, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Abott, Sanofi-Aventis, Memory, Solvay, and Astellas. Dr. Marder has received funds from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Otsuka, Solvay, Pfizer, Merck, Roche, and Wyeth. Dr. Gold receives royalties from the Brief Assessment of Cognition. Dr. Neuchterlein has received a grant from Janssen.Funding for the MATRICS Initiative was provided through contract N01MH22006 from NIMH to the University of California, Los Angeles (Dr. Marder, principal investigator, Dr. Green, co-principal investigator, Dr. Fenton, project officer). Funding for MATRICS PASS came from an option (Dr. Green, principal investigator, Dr. Nuechterlein, co-principal investigator) to the NIMH MATRICS Initiative.The authors thank Dr. Jim Mintz and the UCLA Semel Institute Biostatistical Unit for developing the data entry systems and Bi-Hong Deng for her help in data management and preparation of the tables. The following staff members at the UCLA-VA site coordinated the training and quality assurance procedures: Karen Cornelius, Psy.D., Kimmy Kee, Ph.D., Mark McGee, Ayala Ofek, and Mark Sergi, Ph.D. Training and quality assurance for the co-primary measures was provided by Alan Bellack, Ph.D., Robert Bilder, Ph.D., Sherry Goldman, M.A., Thomas Patterson, Ph.D., Margaret Poe, Shannon Thomas-Lohrman, M.S., and Joseph Ventura, Ph.D.Dr. Fenton died in September 2006.AcknowledgmentOther members of the MATRICS Outcomes Committee included Jean Addington, Robert Heinssen, Richard Mohs, Thomas Patterson, and Dawn Velligan.,;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号