首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Epidemiology >Constructing Inverse Probability Weights for Marginal Structural Models
【24h】

Constructing Inverse Probability Weights for Marginal Structural Models

机译:构造边际结构模型的逆概率权重

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The method of inverse probability weighting (henceforth, weighting) can be used to adjust for measured confounding and selection bias under the four assumptions of consistency, exchangeability, positivity, and no misspecification of the model used to estimate weights. In recent years, several published estimates of the effect of time-varying exposures have been based on weighted estimation of the parameters of marginal structural models because, unlike standard statistical methods, weighting can appropriately adjust for measured time-varying confounders affected by prior exposure. As an example, the authors describe the last three assumptions using the change in viral load due to initiation of antiretroviral therapy among 918 human immunodeficiency virus-infected US men and women followed for a median of 5.8 years between 1996 and 2005. The authors describe possible tradeoffs that an epidemiologist may encounter when attempting to make inferences. For instance, a tradeoff between bias and precision is illustrated as a function of the extent to which confounding is controlled. Weight truncation is presented as an informal and easily implemented method to deal with these tradeoffs. Inverse probability weighting provides a powerful methodological tool that may uncover causal effects of exposures that are otherwise obscured. However, as with all methods, diagnostics and sensitivity analyses are essential for proper use.
机译:逆概率加权方法(以下称加权)可用于在一致性,可交换性,积极性和用于估计权重的模型没有错误指定的四个假设下针对测得的混淆和选择偏差进行调整。近年来,一些已发表的时变暴露影响的估计是基于对边际结构模型参数的加权估计,因为与标准统计方法不同,加权可以适当地调整受先前暴露影响的测得的时变混杂因素。例如,作者使用在918个人免疫缺陷病毒感染的美国男性和女性中由于开始抗逆转录病毒治疗而引起的病毒载量变化描述了最后三个假设,在1996年至2005年之间的中位时间为5.8年。流行病学家在进行推断时可能会遇到的折衷。例如,示出了偏差和精度之间的权衡,该偏差是控制混杂程度的函数。权重截断是一种非正式且易于实现的方法,可以解决这些折衷问题。逆概率加权提供了一种强大的方法工具,可以揭示可能被掩盖的暴露的因果关系。但是,与所有方法一样,诊断和敏感性分析对于正确使用至关重要。

著录项

  • 来源
    《American Journal of Epidemiology》 |2008年第6期|p.656-664|共9页
  • 作者单位

    1Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 2Department of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA 3Harvard–MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology, Cambridge, MA;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号