首页> 外文期刊>The American Journal of Economics and Sociology >A Social History of Christian Thought on Abortion: Ambiguity vs. Certainty in Moral Debate
【24h】

A Social History of Christian Thought on Abortion: Ambiguity vs. Certainty in Moral Debate

机译:基督教堕胎思想的社会史:道德辩论中的歧义与确定性

获取原文
       

摘要

The authority of Christian thought is based in scripture, tradition, reason, and experience, with the Bible and church history as the major sources. The abortion debate in the USA has been closely tied to claims that rely on Christian authority. However, Christians have never held uniform views about abortion. The almost complete silence on abortion in the Bible and by the two most important Christian theologiansSt. Augustine in the 5(th) century and St. Thomas Aquinas in the 13(th) centuryundermine sweeping claims about a definitive Christian position. Dogmatism and ethical certainty on abortion were rare in the past and only became dominant themes in the 19(th) century. This article examines both intellectual debates in the Church and social conditions that influenced thinking on sexuality, the role of women, and the internal politics of the Catholic Church. In the 19(th) century, the mostly Protestant medical profession played a pivotal role, not only by creating anti-abortion politics on a national scale, but by taking the place of the patriarchal family in supervising the behavior of women. Protestant churches in the 20(th) century became politicized and divided into liberal and conservative factions, in part over questions of contraception and abortion. Evangelical Protestants were not deeply troubled by the prospect of liberal abortion laws until they became politicized for extraneous reasons. Christian attitudes on abortion continue to form a maze, never a straight line, just as in the past.
机译:基督教思想的权威基于圣经,传统,理性和经验,其中圣经和教会历史为主要来源。在美国,关于堕胎的辩论与依赖基督教权威的主张紧密相关。但是,基督徒从未对堕胎持统一看法。圣经和两位最重要的基督教神学家对堕胎几乎完全保持沉默。公元5世纪的奥古斯丁和13世纪的圣托马斯·阿奎那破坏了关于基督教权威地位的广泛主张。教条主义和堕胎的道德确定性在过去很少见,仅在19世纪成为主要主题。本文探讨了教会中的知识分子辩论以及影响性观念,女性角色和天主教内部政治的社会条件。在19世纪,主要是新教徒的医学界发挥着举足轻重的作用,不仅在全国范围内建立了反对堕胎的政治,而且在监督妇女行为方面取代了父权制家庭。 20世纪的新教教会政治化,分为自由派和保守派,部分原因是避孕和堕胎问题。福音派新教徒并未因自由堕胎法的前景而深深地陷入麻烦,直到他们由于外来原因而被政治化。基督教徒对堕胎的态度像过去一样继续形成迷宫,从未形成直线。

著录项

  • 来源
    《The American Journal of Economics and Sociology》 |2017年第1期|121-227|共107页
  • 作者

    Castuera Ignacio;

  • 作者单位

    Calif State Univ Long Beach, Long Beach, CA 90840 USA|Claremont Sch Theol, Claremont, CA 91711 USA;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 23:43:57

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号