首页> 外文期刊>The American Journal of Economics and Sociology >Editor's Introduction Free Trade: Theory, History, and Practice
【24h】

Editor's Introduction Free Trade: Theory, History, and Practice

机译:编者介绍自由贸易:理论,历史和实践

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Amid the impeachment of Donald Trump that dominated much of the news cycle in late 2019 and early 2020, the United States negotiated and signed a massive new trade deal with Mexico and Canada. Replacing the highly controversial North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) provided updated rules of trade between the three nations, placing greater emphasis on e-commerce. The fact that USMCA passed through the U.S. Congress with widespread bipartisan support further confirms what many economic observers have noted: free trade is no longer a foundational pillar of U.S. foreign policy. Not only does USMCA allow for auto quotas it also provides a poison pill that allows the United States to leave USMCA if either Canada or Mexico enter into a free trade agreement with a non-market economy (a reference to China). Coupled with President Trump's new tariffs on steel and the removal of the United States from the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), the United States seems to have substituted economic nationalism for free trade as a geopolitical strategy.
机译:在唐纳德特朗普的弹劾中,在2019年底和2020年代初,美国谈判并签署了墨西哥和加拿大的大规模新贸易协议。取代高度争议的北美自由贸易协定(NAFTA),美国 - 墨西哥加拿大协议(USMCA)在三国之间提供了更新的贸易规则,更加重视电子商务。 USMCA通过美国国会通过广泛的Bipartisan支持进一步证实了许多经济观察员所指出的:自由贸易不再是美国外交政策的基础支柱。 USMCA不仅允许汽车配额,它还提供了一种毒药,允许美国离开USMCA,如果加拿大或墨西哥与非市场经济(对中国的参考)进入自由贸易协定。再加上总统特朗普对钢铁的新关税以及从跨​​太平洋伙伴关系(TPP)的删除,美国似乎已经为自由贸易替代的经济民族主义作为地缘政治战略。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号