...
首页> 外文期刊>The American economic review >Dynamic Incentives in Wait List Mechanisms
【24h】

Dynamic Incentives in Wait List Mechanisms

机译:等待名单机制中的动态激励

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Many scarce public resources are allocated through a wait list. A particularly salient example is the kidney wait list in the United States, which now has almost 100,000 patients waiting for a lifesaving transplant.While the design of such systems has garnered significant research attention, most theoretical results yield answers that depend on the primitives of the market (compare Su and Zenios 2004; Leshno 2017; Bloch and Cantala 2017). Moreover, the state of the art empirical methods used to prospectively evaluate wait list designs do not incorporate the dynamic incentives that are central to the theoretical literature. Perhaps the most prominent example of an empirically guided redesign is the 2014 reform of the deceased donor kidney allocation system. The kidney committee used the Kidney-Pancreas Simulated Acceptance Module (KPSAM) to predict the transplants that would result from various organ allocation rules. KPSAM allowed the committee to experiment with the priority system, evaluate outcomes and make an informed decision. However, this decision tool simplifies patient acceptance behavior by assuming that it is invariant to priority rules and therefore ignores patients' dynamic incentives.
机译:通过等待列表分配了许多稀缺的公共资源。一个特别突出的例子是美国的肾脏候补名单,目前有将近100,000名患者在等待挽救生命的移植。尽管这种系统的设计已引起了广泛的研究关注,但大多数理论结果得出的答案都取决于肾脏的原始情况。市场(比较Su和Zenios 2004; Leshno 2017; Bloch和Cantala 2017)。此外,用于前瞻性评估候补名单设计的最新经验方法没有包含对理论文献至关重要的动态激励。以经验为指导进行重新设计的最杰出例子也许是2014年对已故捐赠者肾脏分配系统的改革。肾脏委员会使用肾脏-胰腺模拟接受模块(KPSAM)来预测各种器官分配规则可能导致的移植。 KPSAM允许委员会对优先级系统进行试验,评估结果并做出明智的决定。但是,此决策工具通过假定它与优先级规则一致而简化了患者的接受行为,因此忽略了患者的动态诱因。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号