首页> 外文期刊>Alternatives to the High Cost of Litigation >E-Discovery: When 'Arbitration Holds' Are Needed, And When Sanctions Are on the Table
【24h】

E-Discovery: When 'Arbitration Holds' Are Needed, And When Sanctions Are on the Table

机译:电子发现:何时需要“仲裁搁置”以及何时实施制裁

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The vast majority of business is conducted electronically. Often multiple copies of the same document or E-mail are sent to a wide group of individuals. This is an efficient business practice, but it can exacerbate discovery costs in an arbitration or litigation, and may lead to the imposition of sanctions. As many businesses and other entities have processes in place that periodically and automatically delete electronic information or save it to less accessible media, it is important that arbitrating parties institute an "arbitration hold" on the destruction or transfer of electronic information that may be relevant to the dispute.
机译:绝大多数业务都是通过电子方式进行的。通常,同一文档或电子邮件的多个副本会发送给广泛的个人。这是一种有效的商业惯例,但会加剧仲裁或诉讼中的发现费用,并可能导致实施制裁。由于许多企业和其他实体都具有定期自动删除电子信息或将其保存到不易访问的媒体的流程,因此,重要的是,仲裁方应就可能与电子信息有关的销毁或转移建立“仲裁搁置”。争议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号