首页> 外文期刊>Alternatives to the High Cost of Litigation >MEDIATION PRIVILEGE NOT A SHIELD TO PRODUCTION OF DATA OTHERWISE DISCOVERABLE OUTSIDE MEDIATION
【24h】

MEDIATION PRIVILEGE NOT A SHIELD TO PRODUCTION OF DATA OTHERWISE DISCOVERABLE OUTSIDE MEDIATION

机译:调解特权不屏蔽数据的生成,否则可以在外部调解中发现

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

One of the fundamental principles of media- tion is confidentiality: That what is said and written in mediation, stays in mediation. However, this principle of confidentiality cannot be abused, and a party will not be allowed to use mediation as a pretext to shield materials from disclosure that are otherwise admissible or subject to discovery outside of mediation. In Francesca Gonzales, et. al., v. T-Mobile, USA, Inc., et al., Case No. 13cv1029-BEN (BLM) (S.D. Cal. Aug. 14, 2014) (bit. ly/1y824Zh), while discovery requests were pending in an employment class action, the parties agreed to stay general discovery and to focus on discovery required for mediation. The parties also jointly moved the court on three separate occasions to continue expert disclosure and extend class certification filing deadlines. The court declined the parties' third request to extend the class certification deadline and set the new deadline for class certification before the parties' scheduled mediation. Plaintiffs then advised defendants counsel that they intended to usesome of the data produced by defendant to support their motion for class certification. Defendant refused and asserted that all of the data and documents intended to be used by plaintiffs were protected by the mediation privilege. Defendant alleged that, contrary to plaintiffs' characterization of the produced data as "raw data," it had expended significant resources searching for, obtaining, and compiling the data, and that it did so in order to accommodate mediation. Moreover, defendant claimed that the documents it had produced were not business records.
机译:调解的基本原则之一是机密性:调解中所说的和书面的内容都由调解来决定。但是,不能滥用这一保密原则,并且不允许任何当事方以调解为借口来屏蔽材料,以免披露本来可以接受或在调解之外被发现的材料。在Francesca Gonzales等。等人,诉T-Mobile,USA,Inc.等人,案号13cv1029-BEN(BLM)(2014年8月14日,SD卡)(bit.ly/1y824Zh),而发现请求正在处理中在雇佣集体诉讼中,双方同意保留一般性发现,并专注于调解所需的发现。双方还分别在三个不同的场合联合动议法院,以继续进行专家披露并延长集体认证的提交期限。法院拒绝了当事方的第三次延长班级证明期限的请求,并在当事方的预定调解之前确定了新的等级证明期限。然后,原告告告被告律师,他们打算利用被告提供的某些数据来支持其进行集体认证的动议。被告拒绝并断言,原告打算使用的所有数据和文件均受到调解特权的保护。被告称,与原告将生产的数据描述为“原始数据”相反,它已经花费了大量资源来搜索,获取和编译数据,并且这样做是为了调解。此外,被告称其出示的文件不是商业记录。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号