首页> 外文期刊>Alternatives to the High Cost of Litigation >FORUM, INTERRUPTED: 11TH CIRCUIT AFFIRMS A REFUSAL TO COMPEL ARBITRATION
【24h】

FORUM, INTERRUPTED: 11TH CIRCUIT AFFIRMS A REFUSAL TO COMPEL ARBITRATION

机译:陷入困境的论坛:第11电路违反了强制仲裁的规定

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The Eleventh U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has refused to compel arbitration because a loan-agreement provision contained a forum selection clause that the court said was integral to the agreement, and the specified forum was not available to arbitrate the dispute. Inetianbor v. CashCall Inc., No. 13-13822, 2014 WL 4922225 (11th Cir. Oct. 2, 2014) (11th Cir. Oct. 2, 2014). The case is a rare example of a court refusing to enforce what appears to be a clear agreement to arbitrate. But the forum the alternative dispute resolution process was directed to-a sovereign Indian tribal nation-didn't conduct arbitrations. Neither a federal district court nor the appeals court would assign a new forum under the Federal Arbitration Act.
机译:美国第十一巡回上诉法院拒绝强迫仲裁,因为一项贷款协议条款包含一个论坛选择条款,法院说该条款是该协议不可或缺的,并且指定的论坛无法仲裁该争议。 Inetianbor诉CashCall Inc.,2014年13月13日,WL 4922225(2014年10月2日,11日)(2014年10月2日,11日)。该案是法院拒绝执行似乎明确的仲裁协议的罕见案例。但是论坛上的替代性争端解决程序是针对一个主权印度部落民族的,没有进行仲裁。根据《联邦仲裁法》,联邦地方法院和上诉法院都不会分配新的论坛。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号