首页> 外文期刊>Aircraft maintenance technology >Supreme Court: FAA vs. Cooper Damages
【24h】

Supreme Court: FAA vs. Cooper Damages

机译:最高法院:FAA与库珀赔偿金

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

When Congress put together the Privacy Act of 1974, Public Law No. 93-579, it included specific language providing for damages to be paid by the government when some agency violates the Act when dealing with the personal privacy of a citizen. The federal law allows an individual to sue the agencies concerned by creating a private cause of action for its willful and or intentional violation. Congress clearly sought to provide safeguards for citizens against breach of their personal privacy for any misappropriation or mismanagement of personal information that might be in government records. The only way to enforce it was to include a provision for damages to be paid to the aggrieved citizens. The specific language of the statute protects against threats and hazards that might result in "... substantial harm, embarrassment, inconvenience, or unfairness to any individual on whom information is maintained." This of course includes just about every citizen. In order to maintain such confidentiality, the Act controls the disclosure of any information from one agency to another and to third parties. Before any information is exchanged between agencies prior written consent of the person concerned is required by the law.
机译:当国会将1974年的《隐私法》(第93-579号公共法)合并在一起时,其中包含特定的语言,规定当某些机构在处理公民的个人隐私时违反该法时,政府应支付赔偿金。联邦法律允许个人针对其故意和/或故意违反行为,提出私人诉因,以起诉有关机构。国会显然希望为公民提供保护措施,以免因政府记录中可能存在的盗用或管理不当个人信息而侵犯其个人隐私的情况。强制执行该法的唯一方法是包括对受害公民支付赔偿金的规定。该规约的特定语言可以防止威胁和危害,从而可能导致“……对维护信息的任何个人造成实质性伤害,尴尬,不便或不公平”。当然,这几乎包括每个公民。为了保持这种机密性,该法控制了从一个机构向另一机构和第三方的任何信息的披露。法律要求在相关机构之间交换任何信息之前,必须事先获得有关人员的书面同意。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号