【24h】

No such thing

机译:没有这样的事

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

While reading my September 2021 issue of 'Air International' I see another case of "Here comes the latest generation of electric aircraft". I have no doubt that there will be applications where electric propulsion will be appropriate. However, I don't see IT reaching the heights that many pundits are forecasting today. Let me start with this statement: "There is no such thing as an electric powered aircraft or vehicle." I'm a retired engineer with 44 years in that industry. If you want to drive a vehicle at 100kph (61mph) on a road the energy required will be determined by things such as drag coefficient, rolling resistance, frontal area, etc. I would assume that similar criteria apply if you want to have an airplane fly at 1,000kph (610mph), i.e. no matter what the source of the energy is, the same amount is required. In the case of electric propulsion, batteries are the direct source but those batteries are charged by land-based power plants. Officials in California have stated that if one in ten vehicles were electric powered it would crash the power grid. What impact would the addition of electric powered aircraft have?
机译:在阅读我的9月2021年9月的“航空国际”问题时,我看到另一个“这是最新一代的电机”。我毫无疑问,电动推进将适当的应用。但是,我没有看到它达到了今天预测许多Pundits的高度。让我从这个陈述开始:“没有电动飞机或车辆这样的东西。”我是那个在该行业中有44年的退休工程师。如果您想在100公里/小时(61英里/小时)在道路上驾驶车辆,则所需的能量将由拖动系数,滚动阻力,正面区域等的事物确定。如果您想拥有飞机,我将假设类似的标准适用飞行以1,000kph(610mph)飞行,即无论能量的来源是什么,需要相同的金额。在电推进的情况下,电池是直接来源,但这些电池由陆基发电厂充电。加利福尼亚州的官员表示,如果十分之一的车辆是电力电网,它将崩溃电网。电力飞机的增加会有什么影响?

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号