首页> 外文期刊>AI & society >What is wrong about Robocops as consultants? A technology-centric critique of predictive policing
【24h】

What is wrong about Robocops as consultants? A technology-centric critique of predictive policing

机译:Robocops作为顾问有什么问题?以技术为中心的对预测性警察的评论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Fighting crime has historically been a field that drives technological innovation, and it can serve as an example of different governance styles in societies. Predictive policing is one of the recent innovations that covers technical trends such as machine learning, preventive crime fighting strategies, and actual policing in cities. However, it seems that a combination of exaggerated hopes produced by technology evangelists, media hype, and ignorance of the actual problems of the technology may have (over-)boosted sales of software that supports policing by predicting offenders and crime areas. In this paper we analyse currently used predictive policing software packages with respect to common problems of data mining, and describe challenges that arise in the context of their socio-technical application.
机译:从历史上讲,打击犯罪一直是推动技术创新的领域,并且可以作为社会中不同治理方式的例证。预测性警务是涵盖技术趋势(例如机器学习,预防犯罪策略和城市实际警务)的最新创新之一。但是,似乎技术传道者产生的夸大希望,媒体大肆宣传以及对技术实际问题的无知,可能会组合(过度)推销通过预测犯罪者和犯罪地区来支持治安的软件。在本文中,我们针对数据挖掘的常见问题分析了当前使用的预测性警务软件包,并描述了在其社会技术应用环境下出现的挑战。

著录项

  • 来源
    《AI & society》 |2018年第3期|347-356|共10页
  • 作者单位

    Institute for Software Research, School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University;

    Declarative Languages and Artificial Intelligence Group, Department of Computer Science, KU Leuven;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Predictive policing; Data mining; Privacy; Big data;

    机译:预测性策略;数据挖掘;隐私;大数据;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号