...
首页> 外文期刊>AI & SOCIETY >Doctor Faustus in the twenty-first century
【24h】

Doctor Faustus in the twenty-first century

机译:二十一世纪的浮士德博士

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In the medieval legend, Doctor Faustus strikes a dark deal with the devil; he obtains vast powers for a limited time in exchange for a priceless possession, his eternal soul. The cautionary tale, perhaps more than ever, provides a provocative lens for examining humankind’s condition, notably its indefatigable faith in knowledge and technology and its predilection toward misusing both. A variety of important questions are raised in this meditation including What is the nature of knowledge today and how does it differ from knowledge in prior times? What is its relation to technology and power? What paths are we heading along and which alternative ones are being avoided? Not insignificantly, we also raise the issue of civic ignorance, including that which is intentionally cultivated and that which is simply a lack of knowledge. We also consider the identity of Doctor Faustus in the twenty-first century and in a more material world like ours, what is the soul that he would lose in the bargain, and what damage might be done to Faustus and to innocent bystanders. Finally since people don’t always live up to the terms of agreements they make, what, if anything, could Faustus do to wriggle out of the bargain, to avoid the loss of his all-important soul. Our response is not to disavow knowledge (as the implicit “lesson” of the original myth might suggest) but to shift to another approach to knowledge that is more collective and more responsive to actual needs of our era. This approach which we call civic intelligence is considered as a way to avoid the possible catastrophes that the Faustian bargain we’ve seemingly struck is likely to bring.
机译:在中世纪的传说中,浮士德博士与魔鬼达成了黑暗的协议。他在有限的时间内获得了巨大的力量,以换来他永恒的灵魂-无价的财产。这个警告性的故事也许比以往任何时候都更能为人们提供一种挑衅的视角,来审视人类的状况,尤其是其对知识和技术的不懈追求以及对二者的滥用倾向。在这种冥想中,提出了许多重要的问题,包括当今知识的本质是什么以及它与以前的知识有何不同?它与技术和力量有什么关系?我们正在走什么路,正在避免哪些替代路?并非无关紧要的是,我们还提出了公民无知的问题,包括有意培养的公民无知的问题和仅仅是缺乏知识的问题。我们还考虑了福斯特斯医生在二十一世纪以及像我们这样的更为物质的世界中的身份,他在讨价还价中将失去的灵魂是什么,以及福斯托斯和无辜的旁观者会遭受何种损害。最后,由于人们并不总是遵守他们所达成的协议条款,因此浮士德(Faustus)可以采取什么行动,避免讨价还价,以避免失去他所有重要的灵魂。我们的回应不是拒绝知识(正如原始神话的隐含“教训”所暗示的那样),而是转向另一种对知识的收集方式,这种方式更加集合化并且更能响应我们时代的实际需求。这种我们称为公民情报的方法被认为是避免我们看似已经达成的浮士德式讨价还价可能带来的灾难的一种方式。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号