首页> 外文期刊>Advances in space research >Feasibility analysis of LEO and GEO large space debris de/re-orbiting taking into account launch mass of spacecraft-collector and its configuration layout
【24h】

Feasibility analysis of LEO and GEO large space debris de/re-orbiting taking into account launch mass of spacecraft-collector and its configuration layout

机译:狮子座和地球大空间碎片碎片碎片碎片碎片碎片碎片碎片及其构造布局的可行性分析及其配置布局

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Analysis of the efficiency of two basic strategies for de/re-orbiting large space debris objects to disposal orbits (DO) is given. Large objects in LEO are classified into groups with similar orbital inclinations and comprise primarily last stages of launch vehicles, in GEO vicinity the paper studies upper stages. Under the first de/re-orbiting variant, it is assumed a spacecraft-collector is equipped with several thruster de/re-orbiting kits (TDKs); one of them can be fixed on an object and is capable of de/re-orbiting an object to a DO independently of the collector. In the second variant, a collector operates as a space tug: transfers objects to a DO and then returns to the next objects in line. The authors study possible configuration layouts of collectors in LEO and near GEO. The available analogous projects are analyzed. The efficiency of both de/re-orbiting variants can be properly compared using the estimations of collector's dry mass and having at one's disposal the parameters of the maneuvers required for transfers between all objects in the group. As reasonable criteria of effectiveness, one can consider (separately or jointly) the launch mass of an equipped collector, its AV budget, and the required number of such active spacecraft. Two de/re-orbiting variants are compared in terms of these criteria via mass-energy diagrams constructed for each group of objects in both altitude regions. Analysis of these diagrams shows that low Earth orbits can be more efficiently cleaned under the first de-orbiting variant by using a two-stage space system consisting of an active spacecraft carrying TDKs. For GEO, it is expedient to choose the second re-orbiting variant using a single-stage spacecraft. Our analysis shows that LEO cleaning is an order of magnitude more expensive than that for GEO, hence the problem of LEO population should be given increased attention.
机译:给出了DE / RE-ORBINT大空间碎片物体到处理轨道(DO)的两种基本策略效率分析。 Leo中的大物体被分类为具有相似轨道倾斜的组,并且主要包括发动车辆的最后一个阶段,在Geo附近纸张研究上阶段。在第一/重新轨道变型下,假设宇宙飞船集电器配有几个推进器DE / RE-ORBING套件(TDK);其中一个可以固定在对象上,并且能够独立于收集器将物体除去对象。在第二变量中,收集器作为空间拖动机运行:将对象传输到DO,然后返回到下一个对象。作者研究了Leo和Geo附近的收藏家的可能配置布局。分析了可用的类似项目。可以使用收集器的干质量的估计来适当地进行DE /再轨道变体的效率,并且在一个人的处理中进行了处理所需的所有物体所需的演奏者的参数。作为合理的有效性标准,可以考虑(单独或共同)装备集电器,其AV预算和所需数量的此类积极航天器的发射质量。通过针对两个海拔地区中的每组物体构造的质量能图,将两个DE /再轨道变体进行比较。对这些图的分析表明,通过使用由携带TDK的主动航天器组成的两级空间系统,可以在第一去轨变型下更有效地清洁低地球轨道。对于GEO,有利的是使用单级航天器选择第二个重新轨道变量。我们的分析表明,Leo清洁是一个级数比Geo更昂贵的级,因此应提高人群的问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号