首页> 外文期刊>Accounting History Review >Social closure and the incorporation of the Society of Accountants in Edinburgh in 1854
【24h】

Social closure and the incorporation of the Society of Accountants in Edinburgh in 1854

机译:社会停摆,1854年爱丁堡会计师公会成立

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The incorporation of the Society of Accountants in Edinburgh in 1854 has been researched from different perspectives without attention to the overall occupational grouping to which the founders belonged. The existence of this larger community of accountants raises the question of whether the foundation involved social closure. The purpose of the paper is to pose and respond to this question by explaining social closure, examining the Society's foundational process for signs of possible exclusion, and observing founders and non-founders to identify differences in characteristics that provide possible explanations for exclusion. Archival evidence of the foundational process and differences in characteristics is consistent with the possibility of social closure without precluding other explanations for the founder and non-founder groupings. The evidence also raises the question of whether the foundation of the Society is completely explained by the external pressures associated with a potential loss of court-related appointments. The findings in the paper are sufficient to encourage further research of social closure in other associational foundations in the early history of modern public accountancy.View full textDownload full textKeywordsexclusion rules, occupational groupings, professional project, public accountancy, social closureRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09585200903504181
机译:从不同的角度研究了1854年爱丁堡会计师协会的成立,而没有关注创始人所隶属的整个职业群体。这个更大的会计师社区的存在提出了一个问题,即基金会是否涉及社会封闭。本文的目的是通过解释社会封闭,检查协会的基本程序以发现可能的排斥现象,并观察创始人和非创始人的身份以找出特征上的差异,从而为排斥提供可能的解释,从而提出并回答这个问题。基本过程和特征差异的档案证据与社会封闭的可能性相一致,而不排除对创始人和非创始人集团的其他解释。证据还引发了一个问题,即与法院相关任命的潜在损失相关的外部压力是否完全解释了协会的基础。这篇论文的发现足以鼓励人们在现代公共会计的早期历史中进一步研究其他协会基金会中的社会封闭。查看全文下载全文关键字排除规则,职业分组,专业项目,公共会计,社会封闭相关的var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand :“ Taylor&Francis Online”,services_compact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more”,pubid:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09585200903504181

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号