...
首页> 外文期刊>Accountancy >Missing trader VAT fraud and input tax recovery
【24h】

Missing trader VAT fraud and input tax recovery

机译:缺少贸易商增值税欺诈和进项税追回

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

If a business has input tax recovery disallowed by HMRC because there is a connection with fraud, ofthe four tests applied by the courts, it is the ‘knew or should have known test’ on which the case willnormally turn. Therefore, businesses and their advisors should familiarise themselves with this legalprinciple.The ‘knew or should have known’ test is subjective – how much due diligence a customer shouldexercise over their suppliers depends upon the circumstances of the transactions, therefore each casewill turn on its own merits. It is important to bear in mind that the test is also limited – naivety inbusiness dealings does not automatically result in the threshold for the ‘should have known test’ to bepassed.
机译:如果一家企业因与欺诈有关联而被HMRC禁止了进项税追回,那么在法院所采用的四项测试中,通常是“已知或本应知道的测试”。因此,企业及其顾问应熟悉此法律原则。“了解或应知”测试是主观的–客户应对供应商进行多少尽职调查取决于交易的情况,因此每种情况都将由其自行决定。优点。重要的是要记住,测试也是有限的–天真的业务交易不会自动导致“应该知道的测试”通过的阈值。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Accountancy 》 |2019年第12期| 1-7| 共7页
  • 作者

    Sarah Kay;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号