首页> 外文期刊>Accident Analysis & Prevention >Patterns of driver stress and coping strategies in a Greek sample and their relationship to aberrant behaviors and traffic accidents.
【24h】

Patterns of driver stress and coping strategies in a Greek sample and their relationship to aberrant behaviors and traffic accidents.

机译:希腊样本中驾驶员压力和应对策略的模式及其与异常行为和交通事故的关系。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper presents an investigation into the relationship between driver stress, coping strategies and aberrant driving of a Greek sample of company employees (N=714). The results supported the main factor structures of the Driver Behavior Inventory (Matthews, G., Tsuda, A., Xin, G., Ozeki, Y., 1999. Individual differences in driver stress vulnerability in a Japanese sample. Ergonomics 42, 401-415) and Driver Behavior Questionnaire (Kontogiannis, T., Kossiavelou, Z., Marmaras, N., 2002. Self-reports of aberrant behavior on the roads: errors and violations in a sample of Greek drivers. Accident Anal. Prev. 34, 391-399). An inventory of coping strategies was also examined in terms of self reports. Confrontive coping was characteristic of drivers high on aggression who also had higher rates of mistakes and violations. Coping in terms of self-criticism was exhibited by drivers high on dislike of driving (i.e., anxiety) who reported a higher incidence of mistakes. Task-focus coping was characteristic of alertness and had a weak correlation with confidence. Drivers high in confidence reported fewer mistakes and violations which, in association with low perception of risk, was a particularly worrying aspect of driving. A contextual model of accident involvement was tested with LISREL in which violations yielded a direct effect whilst aggression yielded an indirect effect mediated by violations. Alertness and confidence were both related to safety orientation but failed to predict accident rates and speeding convictions.
机译:本文对希腊公司雇员样本(N = 714)的驾驶员压力,应对策略和异常驾驶之间的关系进行了调查。结果支持了驾驶员行为量表的主要因素结构(Matthews,G.,Tsuda,A.,Xin,G.,Ozeki,Y.,1999.在日本样本中驾驶员压力脆弱性的个体差异。人机工程学42,401) -415)和驾驶员行为问卷(Kontogiannis,T.,Kossiavelou,Z.,Marmaras,N.,2002.自我报告道路上的异常行为:希腊驾驶员样本中的错误和违法行为。 34,391-399)。还根据自我报告检查了应对策略清单。面对性应对是攻击性高的驾驶员的特征,他们也有较高的错误率和违规率。高度不喜欢驾驶(即焦虑)的驾驶员表现出自我批评的应对能力,他们报告的失误几率更高。以任务为中心的应对是机敏的特征,与信心的相关性较弱。充满自信的驾驶员报告的错误和违规行为减少,而对风险的低感知则是驾驶中特别令人担忧的方面。使用LISREL测试了事故参与的上下文模型,其中违规产生直接影响,而侵略产生由违规介导的间接影响。机敏性和自信心都与安全导向有关,但无法预测事故发生率和加快定罪速度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号