首页> 外文期刊>Accident Analysis & Prevention >Experimental research on the effectiveness and adaptability of speed reduction markings in downhill sections on urban roads: A driving simulation study
【24h】

Experimental research on the effectiveness and adaptability of speed reduction markings in downhill sections on urban roads: A driving simulation study

机译:城市道路下坡路段减速标志的有效性和适应性试验研究:行车模拟研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The objective of this paper is to test the effectiveness and adaptability of speed reduction markings (SRMs) in downhill sections on urban roads with distinct roadway grades. Empirical data including vehicle speed and acceleration were collected in a driving simulator. Subjective questionnaires were conducted, and two indexes - the relative speed difference and standard deviation of acceleration - were developed to evaluate the effectiveness and adaptability of SRMs. Meanwhile, the effectiveness of driving simulator related to different road alignments and types of SRMs has been validated through a field test. Results of subjective questionnaires showed that the majority of subjects had no feelings of nervousness, but they were affected by SRMs while driving through downhill sections in all four scenarios (i.e., downhill sections with vertical grades of 3,2,1.5 and 1%). In terms of vehicle speed and acceleration, the results of the analysis of variance (AN0VA) and the contrast analysis (S-N-K method) indicated that SRMs were significantly effective when roadway grades of downgrade sections were 1.5,2 and 3%, while transverse speed reduction markings (TSRMs) had significantly worse adaptability (P< 0.05). Therefore, this research recommends that TSRMs could be placed in downhill sections with roadway grades of 1.5 or 2%; longitudinal speed reduction markings (LSRMs) could be placed in downhill sections with a roadway grade of 3%. Whether SRMs are placed in downhill sections with a roadway grade of 1 % would depend on other factors such as financial issues and crash records, which are not considered in this paper.
机译:本文的目的是在具有不同道路坡度的城市道路上,测试下坡路段减速标记的有效性和适应性。在驾驶模拟器中收集了包括车速和加速度在内的经验数据。进行了主观问卷调查,并开发了两个指标-相对速度差和加速度标准偏差-来评估SRM的有效性和适应性。同时,已通过现场测试验证了与不同道路路线和SRM类型相关的驾驶模拟器的有效性。主观调查问卷的结果表明,大多数受试者没有紧张感,但在所有四种情况下(即垂直坡度分别为3、2、1.5和1%的下坡路段)开车穿越下坡路段时,他们都受到SRM的影响。在车速和加速度方面,方差分析(AN0VA)和对比分析(SNK方法)的结果表明,当下坡路段的坡度分别为1.5%,2%和3%时,SRM显着有效,而横向速度降低标记(TSRMs)的适应性明显较差(P <0.05)。因此,本研究建议将TSRM放置在道路坡度为1.5%或2%的下坡路段。纵向减速标记(LSRM)可以放置在坡度为3%的下坡路段。是否将SRM放置在道路坡度为1%的下坡路段,将取决于其他因素,例如财务问题和事故记录,本文中未考虑。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号