首页> 外文期刊>Academy of Management Journal >UNDERSTANDING COMMUNITY DYNAMICS IN THE STUDY OF GRAND CHALLENGES: HOW NONPROFITS, INSTITUTIONAL ACTORS, AND THE COMMUNITY FABRIC INTERACT TO INFLUENCE INCOME INEQUALITY
【24h】

UNDERSTANDING COMMUNITY DYNAMICS IN THE STUDY OF GRAND CHALLENGES: HOW NONPROFITS, INSTITUTIONAL ACTORS, AND THE COMMUNITY FABRIC INTERACT TO INFLUENCE INCOME INEQUALITY

机译:理解大型挑战中的社区动力学:非盈利,制度因素以及社区面料如何影响收入不平等

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

This paper provides a conceptual model that explains how competitive and institutional dynamics at the community level influence the ability of welfare-oriented nonprofits to eradicate income inequality. To test our framework, we build a large and unique seven-year panel dataset consisting of data from 245 U.S. communities. We find that increasing the number of welfare nonprofits is beneficial for reducing community inequality, but only up to a point, after which resource competition decreases their effectiveness. This competition for resources is also present when a high density of elite-oriented nonprofits operates in the same community. Hypotheses focused on the institutional dimension receive mixed support. As predicted, welfare nonprofits are more effective when they operate in communities with strong law enforcement capabilities and less effective in politically conservative local contexts. Contrary to our expectations, however, we find that welfare nonprofits are less effective in demographically heterogeneous local contexts and when the government provides effective social policies, thus indicating a possible substitution effect. Surprisingly, nonprofit effectiveness is increased in highly financialized local contexts. Together, our results indicate that issues of competition, institutional alignment, and community support in the context of grand challenges are more complex than originally thought.
机译:本文提供了一个概念模型,解释了社区一级的竞争和制度动态如何影响以福利为导向的非营利组织消除收入不平等的能力。为了测试我们的框架,我们建立了一个庞大而独特的七年小组数据集,其中包含来自245个美国社区的数据。我们发现,增加福利非营利组织的数量有助于减少社区不平等,但仅在一定程度上会导致资源竞争降低其有效性。当在同一社区中有大量的以精英为导向的非营利组织运作时,也会出现资源竞争。专注于制度层面的假设得到了混合支持。如预测的那样,福利非营利组织在具有强大执法能力的社区中运营,而在政治上保守的当地环境中,效率较低。但是,与我们的预期相反,我们发现福利非营利组织在人口统计学上异质的当地环境中以及政府提供有效的社会政策时效果不佳,从而表明可能存在替代效应。出乎意料的是,在高度财务化的本地环境中,非营利效率得到提高。总之,我们的结果表明,在面临巨大挑战的情况下,竞争,体制协调和社区支持等问题比原先想象的要复杂。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Academy of Management Journal》 |2016年第6期|1940-1964|共25页
  • 作者单位

    IESE Business Sch, Strateg Management, Madrid, Spain|IESE Business Sch, Schneider Elect Chair Sustainabil & Business Stra, Madrid, Spain;

    IE Business Sch, Madrid, Spain;

    EADA Business Sch, Strateg Management, Barcelona, Spain;

    IESE Business Sch, Strateg Management, Madrid, Spain;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号