首页> 外文期刊>Academy of Management Journal >HOW CAN LEADERS OVERCOME THE BLURRY VISION BIAS? IDENTIFYING AN ANTIDOTE TO THE PARADOX OF VISION COMMUNICATION
【24h】

HOW CAN LEADERS OVERCOME THE BLURRY VISION BIAS? IDENTIFYING AN ANTIDOTE TO THE PARADOX OF VISION COMMUNICATION

机译:领导者如何克服“视觉偏见”?识别视觉传播悖论中的抗药性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Evidence suggests that organizational leaders can inspire employees by communicating a vision of the future with image-based rhetoric-words and phrases that are readily envisioned in the mind's eye (e.g., "our vision is tomakemoviegoers laugh"). Yet research has demonstrated that most leaders do not craft visions with image-based rhetoric, instead favoring abstract language that cannot easily be visualized. We integrate theory on leadership and dual cognitive processing to argue that this problem is exacerbated when leaders focus on word selection when crafting visions because they overemphasize the meaning-based cognitive system (in which they consider the abstract meaning of words) and underemphasize the experience-based cognitive system (in which they can generate vivid mental images of what the future could look like). We introduce a novel tactic to help leaders activate the experience-based system and, in turn, generate and communicate more impactful visions. We also investigate boundary conditions. We test our predictions with three experiments featuring three distinct samples, including one with senior corporate executives and one in which members of the British government crafted visions on the day Britain announced it would exit the European Union ("Brexit").
机译:有证据表明,组织领导者可以通过用图像中的形象化的措辞和短语传达对未来的愿景来激发员工的灵感,这些措辞和短语很容易在头脑中被预想(例如,“我们的愿景是使电影迷们发笑”)。然而研究表明,大多数领导者并不以图像为基础的修辞来构想愿景,而是青睐不易形象化的抽象语言。我们将领导力理论与双重认知加工相结合,认为当领导者在制定愿景时专注于单词选择时,由于他们过分强调了基于含义的认知系统(他们认为单词的抽象含义)而过分强调了经验,因此这一问题会更加严重,基于认知的系统(在该系统中,他们可以生成关于未来前景的生动的心理图像)。我们引入了一种新颖的策略来帮助领导者激活基于经验的系统,进而产生并传达更具影响力的愿景。我们还研究边界条件。我们通过三个实验对我们的预测进行了测试,这些实验包含三个不同的样本,其中一个与高级企业高管一起进行,另一个由英国政府成员在英国宣布退出欧盟当日制定愿景(“英国退欧”)。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Academy of Management Journal》 |2018年第6期|2106-2129|共24页
  • 作者单位

    Cornell Univ, Sch Ind & Labor Relat, Org Behav, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA;

    Univ Penn, Wharton Sch, Management, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号