首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Wiley-Blackwell Online Open >Gaseous emissions from management of solid waste: a systematic review
【2h】

Gaseous emissions from management of solid waste: a systematic review

机译:固体废物管理产生的气体排放:系统评价

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The establishment of sustainable soil waste management practices implies minimizing their environmental losses associated with climate change (greenhouse gases: GHGs) and ecosystems acidification (ammonia: NH3). Although a number of management strategies for solid waste management have been investigated to quantify nitrogen (N) and carbon (C) losses in relation to varied environmental and operational conditions, their overall effect is still uncertain. In this context, we have analyzed the current scientific information through a systematic review. We quantified the response of GHG emissions, NH3 emissions, and total N losses to different solid waste management strategies (conventional solid storage, turned composting, forced aerated composting, covering, compaction, addition/substitution of bulking agents and the use of additives). Our study is based on a meta-analysis of 50 research articles involving 304 observations. Our results indicated that improving the structure of the pile (waste or manure heap) via addition or substitution of certain bulking agents significantly reduced nitrous oxide (N2O) and methane (CH4) emissions by 53% and 71%, respectively. Turned composting systems, unlike forced aerated composted systems, showed potential for reducing GHGs (N2O: 50% and CH4: 71%). Bulking agents and both composting systems involved a certain degree of pollution swapping as they significantly promoted NH3 emissions by 35%, 54%, and 121% for bulking agents, turned and forced aerated composting, respectively. Strategies based on the restriction of O2 supply, such as covering or compaction, did not show significant effects on reducing GHGs but substantially decreased NH3 emissions by 61% and 54% for covering and compaction, respectively. The use of specific additives significantly reduced NH3 losses by 69%. Our meta-analysis suggested that there is enough evidence to refine future Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) methodologies from solid waste, especially for solid waste composting practices. More holistic and integrated approaches are therefore required to develop more sustainable solid waste management systems.
机译:建立可持续的土壤废物管理措施意味着将与气候变化(温室气体:GHGs)和生态系统酸化(氨:NH3)相关的环境损失降至最低。尽管已研究了多种固体废物管理策略,以量化与变化的环境和操作条件相关的氮(N)和碳(C)损失,但它们的总体效果仍不确定。在这种情况下,我们通过系统的回顾分析了当前的科学信息。我们量化了温室气体排放,NH3排放和总氮损失对不同固体废物管理策略(常规固体存储,转向堆肥,强迫充气堆肥,覆盖,压实,添加/替代填充剂和使用添加剂)的响应。我们的研究基于对涉及304个观测值的50篇研究文章的荟萃分析。我们的结果表明,通过添加或替代某些填充剂来改善堆肥(废物或粪肥堆)的结构,可使一氧化二氮(N2O)和甲烷(CH4)的排放量分别减少53%和71%。与强制充气堆肥系统不同,转向堆肥系统显示出减少温室气体的潜力(N2O:50%和CH4:71%)。膨胀剂和两种堆肥系统都进行一定程度的污染交换,因为它们分别使翻堆和强迫充气堆肥的NH3排放量分别显着增加了35%,54%和121%。基于氧气供应限制的策略(例如覆盖或压实)并未显示出对减少温室气体的显着影响,但对于覆盖和压实而言,分别将NH3排放量分别减少了61%和54%。使用特定的添加剂可将NH3的损失减少69%。我们的荟萃分析表明,有足够的证据可以从固体废物中提炼出未来的政府间气候变化专门委员会(IPCC)方法,特别是在固体废物堆肥实践中。因此,需要更全面和综合的方法来开发更可持续的固体废物管理系统。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号