首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Wiley-Blackwell Online Open >Debt and development in historical perspective: The external constraints of late industrialisation revisited through South Korea and Brazil
【2h】

Debt and development in historical perspective: The external constraints of late industrialisation revisited through South Korea and Brazil

机译:历史视角下的债务与发展:韩国和巴西重新审视了后期工业化的外部制约因素

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Current debates about the role of external finance in development mostly overlook the insights from early development economics that late industrialisation generates a structural tendency to run trade deficits, thereby exacerbating rather than relieving external foreign exchange constraints. The developmental role of external finance is therefore based on its strategic marginal contribution to relieve such constraints. External debt in particular also allows countries to pursue industrial strategies without reliance on foreign direct investment. These insights are revisited in this paper as a critical input to both mainstream and heterodox contemporary scholarship on debt and development. While the mainstream generally avoids discussion of state‐led industrial policy, the heterodox has converged on a view that developing countries should avoid external finance. The contrasting external account histories of South Korea and Brazil are examined to demonstrate the validity of the classic insights and the contemporary fallacies. While the South Korean case speaks much to its geopolitical context, this does not necessarily refute the principle that post‐war late development engenders an intensive demand for external finance, which must be met if industrialisation strategies are not to be stymied, as in the case of Brazil, no matter how effectively domestic strategies are conceived and implemented.
机译:当前关于外部金融在发展中的作用的争论大多忽视了早期发展经济学的见解,即晚期工业化产生了结构性趋势,使贸易赤字趋于恶化,从而加剧了而不是减轻了外部外汇限制。因此,外部金融的发展作用是基于其战略边际贡献来减轻这种限制。特别是外债还使各国能够在不依赖外国直接投资的情况下采取工业战略。本文重新审视了这些见解,作为对主流和异性当代关于债务与发展的学术研究的重要投入。尽管主流通常避免讨论由国家主导的产业政策,但异端观点已趋于一致,即发展中国家应避免外部融资。考察了韩国和巴西不同的对外账户历史,以证明经典观点和当代谬论的正确性。尽管韩国的案例充分说明了其地缘政治背景,但这并不一定反驳战后后期发展导致对外部资金的大量需求的原则,如果不妨碍工业化战略的话,必须满足这一要求。巴西,无论如何有效构思和实施国内战略。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号