首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Wiley-Blackwell Online Open >Partner‐specific prediction of RNA‐binding residues in proteins: A critical assessment
【2h】

Partner‐specific prediction of RNA‐binding residues in proteins: A critical assessment

机译:特定于合作伙伴的蛋白质中RNA结合残基的预测:关键评估

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

RNA‐protein interactions play essential roles in regulating gene expression. While some RNA‐protein interactions are “specific”, that is, the RNA‐binding proteins preferentially bind to particular RNA sequence or structural motifs, others are “non‐RNA specific.” Deciphering the protein‐RNA recognition code is essential for comprehending the functional implications of these interactions and for developing new therapies for many diseases. Because of the high cost of experimental determination of protein‐RNA interfaces, there is a need for computational methods to identify RNA‐binding residues in proteins. While most of the existing computational methods for predicting RNA‐binding residues in RNA‐binding proteins are oblivious to the characteristics of the partner RNA, there is growing interest in methods for partner‐specific prediction of RNA binding sites in proteins. In this work, we assess the performance of two recently published partner‐specific protein‐RNA interface prediction tools, PS‐PRIP, and PRIdictor, along with our own new tools. Specifically, we introduce a novel metric, RNA‐specificity metric (RSM), for quantifying the RNA‐specificity of the RNA binding residues predicted by such tools. Our results show that the RNA‐binding residues predicted by previously published methods are oblivious to the characteristics of the putative RNA binding partner. Moreover, when evaluated using partner‐agnostic metrics, RNA partner‐specific methods are outperformed by the state‐of‐the‐art partner‐agnostic methods. We conjecture that either (a) the protein‐RNA complexes in PDB are not representative of the protein‐RNA interactions in nature, or (b) the current methods for partner‐specific prediction of RNA‐binding residues in proteins fail to account for the differences in RNA partner‐specific versus partner‐agnostic protein‐RNA interactions, or both.
机译:RNA-蛋白质相互作用在调节基因表达中起重要作用。尽管某些RNA蛋白相互作用是“特异性的”,即RNA结合蛋白优先结合特定的RNA序列或结构基序,而另一些则是“非RNA特异性的”。理解蛋白质-RNA识别代码对于理解这些相互作用的功能含义以及开发针对多种疾病的新疗法至关重要。由于实验确定蛋白质-RNA界面的成本很高,因此需要一种计算方法来鉴定蛋白质中的RNA结合残基。尽管目前大多数用于预测RNA结合蛋白中RNA结合残基的计算方法都忽略了伴侣RNA的特征,但人们对用于蛋白质中RNA结合位点的伴侣特异性预测方法的兴趣日益浓厚。在这项工作中,我们评估了两个最近发布的合作伙伴专用蛋白RNA界面预测工具PS-PRIP和PRIdictor的性能,以及我们自己的新工具。具体来说,我们引入了一种新颖的度量标准,即RNA特异性度量标准(RSM),用于量化此类工具预测的RNA结合残基的RNA特异性。我们的结果表明,通过先前发表的方法预测的RNA结合残基忽略了假定的RNA结合伴侣的特征。此外,当使用与伴侣无关的指标进行评估时,RNA伴侣特定的方法要优于最新的与伴侣无关的方法。我们推测(a)PDB中的蛋白质-RNA复合物不能代表自然界中的蛋白质-RNA相互作用,或者(b)当前用于蛋白质中RNA结合残基的伴侣特异性预测的现有方法无法解释RNA伴侣特异性蛋白和伴侣不可知蛋白RNA相互作用的差异,或两者都有差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号