首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Wiley-Blackwell Online Open >Treatment patterns in children with autism in the United States
【2h】

Treatment patterns in children with autism in the United States

机译:美国自闭症儿童的治疗方式

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Children with autism receive different types of non‐drug treatments. We aimed to describe caregiver‐reported pattern of care and its variability by geography and healthcare coverage in a US‐wide sample of children aged 3–17 years. We recruited caregivers from the Simons Foundation Powering Autism Research for Knowledge (SPARK) cohort. Two online questionnaires (non‐drug treatment, Autism Impact Measure) were completed in September/October 2017. Primary outcome measures were caregiver‐reported types and intensities of treatments (behavioral, developmental/relationship, speech and language (SLT), occupational, psychological, “other”; parent/caregiver training) in the previous 12 months. Main explanatory variables were geography and type of healthcare coverage. We investigated associations between the type/intensity of treatments and geography (metropolitanonmetropolitan) or coverage (Medicaid vs privately insured by employer) using regression analysis. Caregivers (n = 5,122) were mainly mothers (92.1%) with mean (SD) age of 39.0 (7.3) years. Mean child age was 9.1 (3.9) years; mostly males (80.0%). Almost all children received at least one intervention (96.0%). Eighty percent received SLT or occupational therapy, while 52.0% received both. Behavioral therapy and SLT were significantly more frequent and more intense in metropolitan than in nonmetropolitan areas. No consistently significant associations were seen between healthcare coverage and frequency or intensity of interventions. At least one barrier such as “waiting list” and “no coverage” was reported by 44.8%. In conclusion, in children sampled from SPARK, we observed differences between metropolitan and nonmetropolitan areas, while we did not find significant differences between those privately insured versus Medicaid. >Autism Res 2019, 12: 517–526 © 2019 The Authors. Autism Research published by International Society for Autism Research published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
机译:自闭症儿童接受不同类型的非药物治疗。我们的目的是在美国范围内的3-17岁儿童样本中,按地理区域和医疗保健覆盖率描述照护者报告的照护模式及其变异性。我们从西蒙斯基金会助力自闭症知识研究(SPARK)队列中招募了看护人。 2017年9月/ 10月,完成了两份在线问卷(非药物治疗,自闭症影响测量)。主要结局指标是护理人员报告的治疗类型和强度(行为,发育/关系,言语和语言(SLT),职业,心理状况) ,“其他”;家长/照料者培训)。主要的解释变量是地理和医疗保健类型。我们使用回归分析调查了治疗类型/强度与地理位置(大都市/非大都市)或覆盖范围(医疗保险与雇主私人保险)之间的关联。照料者(n = 5,122)主要是母亲(92.1%),平均(SD)年龄为39.0(7.3)岁。平均儿童年龄为9.1(3.9)岁;多数为男性(80.0%)。几乎所有儿童都接受了至少一种干预(96.0%)。 80%的人接受了SLT或职业疗法,而52.0%的人都接受了SLT或职业疗法。与非都市地区相比,行为疗法和SLT在大都市地区的发生频率和强度明显更高。在医疗保健覆盖率与干预频率或干预强度之间未发现始终存在显着关联。据报告,至少有一个障碍,如“等待名单”和“没有覆盖”,占44.8%。总之,在从SPARK抽样的儿童中,我们观察到大城市和非大都市地区之间的差异,而我们没有发现私人保险与医疗补助之间的显着差异。 >自闭症研究,2019,12:517-526©2019作者。由Wiley Periodicals,Inc.发布的国际自闭症研究协会出版的《自闭症研究》。

著录项

代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号