首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Taylor Francis Open Select >Ethics and the Responsible Conduct of Research in the Chemical Community: The Unique Role and Challenges of the News Media
【2h】

Ethics and the Responsible Conduct of Research in the Chemical Community: The Unique Role and Challenges of the News Media

机译:道德与化学界中的负责任研究行为:新闻媒体的独特作用和挑战

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Journalists who cover scientific research, including chemistry research, have an obligation to report on alleged cases of research misconduct when knowledge of these surface. New Government definitions of research misconduct, beginning in the late 1990s with the Clinton Administration, have helped scientists, policymakers, as well as journalists sort out and make sense of alleged research misconduct. Journalistic reporting on research misconduct includes many challenges: gathering information from sources who are intimidated or afraid to speak, strict adherence to journalist ethics that take on a new dimension when careers, reputations, and research funding are at stake; efforts by government and institutional bureaucrats to dampen or thwart legitimate news coverage. The Internet, blogging, and social media have added still more complexity and ethical quandaries to this blend. The author, News Editor of Chemical & Engineering News published by the American Chemical Society, provides examples from his own career and that of colleagues. He suggests that an enhanced spirit of understanding and cooperation between journalists and members of the scientific community can lead to avenues of open discussion of research misconduct—discussions that might prevent and mitigate the very real damage caused by bad actors in science who betray themselves, their peers, and the body of modern day scientific knowledge when they make the decision to march into the darkness of dishonesty, plagiarism, or falsification.
机译:报道包括化学研究在内的科学研究的新闻工作者有义务在了解到这些所谓的研究不当行为的情况后,予以举报。从1990年代末开始,克林顿政府开始对政府的研究不当行为进行新的定义,这有助于科学家,政策制定者和新闻记者进行梳理,并弄清所谓的研究不当行为。关于研究不当行为的新闻报道面临许多挑战:从恐吓或不敢说话的消息来源收集信息;严格遵守新闻工作者的道德规范,当职业,声誉和研究经费受到威胁时,新闻道德规范将出现新的层面;政府和机构官员为抑制或阻止合法新闻报道所做的努力。互联网,博客和社交媒体为这种混合方式增加了更多的复杂性和道德困境。作者是美国化学学会(American Chemical Society)出版的《化学与工程新闻》(Chemical&Engineering News)的新闻编辑,作者提供了自己和同事的职业实例。他建议,新闻工作者与科学界成员之间加强理解与合作的精神,可以导致公开讨论研究不端行为的途径。这种讨论可以防止和减轻由于科学中的不良行为者背叛自己,自己的行为而造成的真正损害。同行以及现代科学知识的主体,他们决定进军不诚实,窃或伪造的黑暗。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号