首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Taylor Francis Open Select >Hypothesis-based weight-of-evidence evaluation and risk assessment for naphthalene carcinogenesis
【2h】

Hypothesis-based weight-of-evidence evaluation and risk assessment for naphthalene carcinogenesis

机译:基于假设的证据权重评估和萘致癌风险评估

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Inhalation of naphthalene causes olfactory epithelial nasal tumors in rats (but not in mice) and benign lung adenomas in mice (but not in rats). The limited available human data have not identified an association between naphthalene exposure and increased respiratory cancer risk. Assessing naphthalene's carcinogenicity in humans, therefore, depends entirely on experimental evidence from rodents. We evaluated the respiratory carcinogenicity of naphthalene in rodents, and its potential relevance to humans, using our Hypothesis-Based Weight-of-Evidence (HBWoE) approach. We systematically and comparatively reviewed data relevant to key elements in the hypothesized modes of action (MoA) to determine which is best supported by the available data, allowing all of the data from each realm of investigation to inform interpretation of one another. Our analysis supports a mechanism that involves initial metabolism of naphthalene to the epoxide, followed by GSH depletion, cytotoxicity, chronic inflammation, regenerative hyperplasia, and tumor formation, with possible weak genotoxicity from downstream metabolites occurring only at high cytotoxic doses, strongly supporting a non-mutagenic threshold MoA in the rat nose. We also conducted a dose–response analysis, based on the likely MoA, which suggests that the rat nasal MoA is not relevant in human respiratory tissues at typical environmental exposures. Our analysis illustrates how a thorough WoE evaluation can be used to support a MoA, even when a mechanism of action cannot be fully elucidated. A non-mutagenic threshold MoA for naphthalene-induced rat nasal tumors should be considered as a basis to determine human relevance and to guide regulatory and risk-management decisions.
机译:吸入萘会在大鼠(但不是在老鼠)中引起嗅觉上皮性鼻腔肿瘤,并在小鼠(但不是老鼠)中引起良性肺腺瘤。有限的现有人类数据尚未确定萘暴露与呼吸道癌风险增加之间的关联。因此,评估萘对人的致癌性完全取决于啮齿动物的实验证据。我们使用基于假设的证据权重(HBWoE)方法评估了萘在啮齿动物中的呼吸致癌性及其与人类的潜在相关性。我们系统地比较了与假设的行动模式(MoA)中的关键要素相关的数据,以确定可用数据最好地支持了哪些数据,从而允许来自每个调查领域的所有数据相互解释。我们的分析支持一种机制,该机制涉及萘最初代谢为环氧化物,然后是GSH耗竭,细胞毒性,慢性炎症,再生性增生和肿瘤形成,并且下游代谢产物可能仅在高细胞毒性剂量时才产生弱的遗传毒性,强烈支持非鼠鼻子中的MoA致突变阈值。我们还基于可能的MoA进行了剂量反应分析,这表明在典型的环境暴露下,大鼠鼻腔MoA与人体呼吸组织无关。我们的分析表明,即使无法完全阐明行动机制,也可以使用全面的WoE评估来支持MoA。萘诱导的大鼠鼻腔肿瘤的非致突变性阈值MoA应被视为确定人类相关性并指导监管和风险管理决策的基础。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号