首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Taylor Francis Open Select >Personalizing solidarity? The role of self-tracking in health insurance pricing
【2h】

Personalizing solidarity? The role of self-tracking in health insurance pricing

机译:个性化团结?自我跟踪在健康保险定价中的作用

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Can data-driven innovations, working across an internet of connected things, personalize health insurance prices? The emergence of self-tracking technologies and their adoption and promotion in health insurance products has been characterized as a threat to solidaristic models of healthcare provision. If individual behaviour rather than group membership were to become the basis of risk assessment, the social, economic and political consequences would be far-reaching. It would disrupt the distributive, solidaristic character that is expressed within all health insurance schemes, even in those nominally designated as private or commercial. Personalized risk pricing is at odds with the infrastructures that presently define, regulate and deliver health insurance. Self-tracking can be readily imagined as an element in an ongoing bio-political redistribution of the burden of responsibility from the state to citizens but it is not clear that such a scenario could be delivered within existing individual private health insurance operational and regulatory infrastructures. In what can be gleaned from publicly available sources discussing pricing experience in the individual markets established by the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 2010 (ACA), widely known as ‘Obamacare’, it appears unlikely that it can provide the means to personalize price. Using the case of Oscar Health, a technology driven start-up trading in the ACA marketplaces, I explore the concepts, politics and infrastructures at work in health insurance markets.
机译:跨互联物联网的数据驱动型创新能否个性化健康保险价格?自我跟踪技术的出现及其在健康保险产品中的采用和推广已被描述为对医疗保健提供的统一模型的威胁。如果将个人行为而非团体成员身份作为风险评估的基础,那么其社会,经济和政治后果将是深远的。这将破坏所有健康保险计划中表达的分配性,团结性,即使名义上指定为私人或商业计划也是如此。个性化的风险定价与目前定义,监管和交付健康保险的基础设施不符。可以轻易地将自我跟踪视为国家对公民的责任负担进行生物政治再分配的一个要素,但尚不清楚这种情况是否可以在现有的个人私人健康保险运营和监管基础架构中实现。从可公开获取的信息中,根据《 2010年患者保护和负担得起的医疗法案》(ACA)建立的,在各个市场上的定价经验(通常被称为“ Obamacare”),可以发现,它似乎不可能提供个性化价格的手段。以OCA Health(ACA市场中以技术为驱动力的初创企业交易)为例,我探索了健康保险市场中起作用的概念,政治和基础设施。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号