首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Springer Open Choice >Applications of calendar instruments in social surveys: a review
【2h】

Applications of calendar instruments in social surveys: a review

机译:日历工具在社会调查中的应用:回顾

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Retrospective reports in survey interviews and questionnaires are subject to many types of recall error, which affect completeness, consistency, and dating accuracy. Concerns about this problem have led to the development of so-called calendar instruments, or timeline techniques. These aided recall procedures have been designed to help respondents gain better access to long-term memory by providing a graphical time frame in which life history information can be represented. In order to obtain more insights into the potential benefits of calendar methodology, this paper presents a review of the application of calendar instruments, their design characteristics and effects on data quality. Calendar techniques are currently used in a variety of fields, including life course research, epidemiology and family planning studies. Despite the growing interest in these new methods, their application often lacks sufficient theoretical foundation and little attention has been paid to their effectiveness. Several recent studies however, have demonstrated that in comparison to more traditional survey methods, calendar techniques can improve some aspects of data quality. While calendar instruments have been shown to be potentially beneficial to retrospective data quality, there is an apparent need for methodological research that generates more systematic knowledge about their application in social surveys.
机译:调查访谈和问卷调查中的回顾性报告会受到多种召回错误的影响,这些错误会影响完整性,一致性和约会准确性。对这个问题的担忧导致了所谓的日历工具或时间轴技术的发展。这些辅助召回程序旨在通过提供可以表示生活历史信息的图形时间框架,帮助受访者更好地访问长期记忆。为了更深入地了解日历方法的潜在优势,本文对日历工具的应用,其设计特点以及对数据质量的影响进行了综述。日历技术目前用于各种领域,包括生命历程研究,流行病学和计划生育研究。尽管人们对这些新方法的兴趣日益浓厚,但它们的应用通常缺乏足够的理论基础,对其有效性的关注也很少。但是,最近的一些研究表明,与更传统的调查方法相比,日历技术可以改善数据质量的某些方面。尽管日历工具已经显示出对回顾性数据质量的潜在好处,但是显然需要进行方法学研究,以产生关于其在社会调查中的应用的更系统的知识。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号