首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Springer Open Choice >Trust in Nanotechnology? On Trust as Analytical Tool in Social Research on Emerging Technologies
【2h】

Trust in Nanotechnology? On Trust as Analytical Tool in Social Research on Emerging Technologies

机译:相信纳米技术吗?信任作为新兴技术社会研究的分析工具

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Trust has become an important aspect of evaluating the relationship between lay public and technology implementation. Experiences have shown that a focus on trust provides a richer understanding of reasons for backlashes of technology in society than a mere focus of public understanding of risks and science communication. Therefore, trust is also widely used as a key concept for understanding and predicting trust or distrust in emerging technologies. But whereas trust broadens the scope for understanding established technologies with well-defined questions and controversies, it easily fails to do so with emerging technologies, where there are no shared questions, a lack of public familiarity with the technology in question, and a restricted understanding amongst social researchers as to where distrust is likely to arise and how and under which form the technology will actually be implemented. Rather contrary, ‘trust’ might sometimes even direct social research into fixed structures that makes it even more difficult for social research to provide socially robust knowledge. This article therefore suggests that if trust is to maintain its important role in evaluating emerging technologies, the approach has to be widened and initially focus not on people’s motivations for trust, but rather the object of trust it self, as to predicting how and where distrust might appear, how the object is established as an object of trust, and how it is established in relation with the public.
机译:信任已成为评估公众和技术实施之间关系的重要方面。经验表明,与公众仅对风险和科学传播的理解相比,对信任的关注可以更深入地了解社会中技术的反弹原因。因此,信任也被广泛用作理解和预测新兴技术中信任或不信任的关键概念。但是,尽管信任扩大了对具有明确问题和争议的已建立技术的理解的范围,但是对于新兴技术而言,它很容易无法做到,因为新兴技术没有共同的问题,公众对所讨论的技术缺乏了解,并且了解有限在社会研究人员中,关于不信任可能在何处发生以及该技术将如何实际实施以及以何种形式实施。恰恰相反,“信任”有时甚至会将社会研究引导到固定的结构中,这使社会研究更加难以提供对社会稳定的知识。因此,本文建议,如果要保持信任在评估新兴技术中的重要作用,则必须扩大方法,并且最初不应将重点放在人们寻求信任的动机上,而应着眼于信任自身的对象,以预测不信任的方式和位置。可能会出现,如何将对象确立为信任的对象,以及如何与公众建立联系。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号