首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Springer Open Choice >Domesticating the Drone: The Demilitarisation of Unmanned Aircraft for Civil Markets
【2h】

Domesticating the Drone: The Demilitarisation of Unmanned Aircraft for Civil Markets

机译:无人机驯化:民用飞机的非军事化

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Remotely piloted aviation systems (RPAS) or ‘drones’ are well known for their military applications, but could also be used for a range of non-military applications for state, industrial, commercial and recreational purposes. The technology is advanced and regulatory changes are underway which will allow their use in domestic airspace. As well as the functional and economic benefits of a strong civil RPAS sector, the potential benefits for the military RPAS sector are also widely recognised. Several actors have nurtured this dual-use aspect of civil RPAS development. However, concerns have been raised about the public rejecting the technology because of their association with military applications and potentially controversial applications, for example in policing and border control. In contrast with the enthusiasm for dual-use exhibited throughout the EC consultation process, the strategy for avoiding public rejection devised in its roadmap would downplay the connection between military and non-military RPAS and focus upon less controversial applications such as search and rescue. We reflect upon this contrast in the context of the European agenda of responsible research and innovation. In doing so, we do not rely upon critique of drones per se, in their neither their civil nor military guise, but explore the extent to which current strategies for managing their public acceptability are compatible with a responsible and socially beneficial development of RPAS for civil purposes.
机译:远程驾驶航空系统(RPAS)或“无人机”以其军事应用而闻名,但也可以用于国家,工业,商业和娱乐目的的一系列非军事应用。该技术是先进的,并且正在进行法规变更,这将使其可以在国内空域使用。除了强大的民用RPAS部门的功能和经济收益外,军事RPAS部门的潜在收益也得到了广泛认可。几个角色已经培育了民用RPAS开发的双重用途。但是,由于公众拒绝使用该技术,已经引起了人们的关注,因为该技术与军事应用以及潜在的有争议的应用(例如在警务和边境控制中)相关联。与整个EC磋商过程中表现出的双重使用热情相反,在其路线图中制定的避免公众拒绝的策略将轻视军事和非军事RPAS之间的联系,而将重点放在诸如搜索和救援之类的争议较小的应用上。我们在负责任的研究和创新的欧洲议程中对这种对比进行了反思。在这样做时,我们不以无人机本身的民事或军事姿态来批评无人机本身,而是探索当前管理其公众可接受性的策略与针对民用的RPAS负责任和对社会有益的发展相适应的程度目的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号