首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Springer Open Choice >Orchestrating an immune response against cancer with engineered immune cells expressing αβTCRs CARs and innate immune receptors: an immunological and regulatory challenge
【2h】

Orchestrating an immune response against cancer with engineered immune cells expressing αβTCRs CARs and innate immune receptors: an immunological and regulatory challenge

机译:用表达αβTCRCAR和先天性免疫受体的工程化免疫细胞协调针对癌症的免疫应答:免疫学和监管挑战

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Over half a century ago, the first allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) initiated cellular immunotherapy. For several decades, little progress was made, and toxicity of allo-SCT remained a major challenge. However, recent breakthroughs have opened new avenues to further develop this modality and to provide less toxic and equally efficient interventions for patients suffering from hematological or solid malignancies. Current novel cellular immune interventions include ex vivo expansion and adoptive transfer of tumor-infiltrating immune cells or administration of drugs which antagonize tolerizing mechanisms. Alternatively, transfer of immune cells engineered to express defined T cell receptors (TCRs) and chimeric antigen receptors (CARs) has shown its potential. A valuable addition to ‘engineered’ adaptive immunity has emerged recently through the improved understanding of how innate immune cells can attack cancer cells without substantial side effects. This has enabled the development of transplantation platforms with limited side effects allowing early immune interventions as well as the design of engineered immune cells expressing innate immune receptors. Here, we focus on innate immune interventions and their orchestration with TCR- and CAR-engineered immune cells. In addition, we discuss how the exploitation of the full potential of cellular immune interventions is influenced by regulatory frameworks. Finally, we highlight and discuss substantial differences in the current landscape of clinical trials in Europe as compared to the USA. The aim is to stimulate international efforts to support regulatory authorities and funding agencies, especially in Europe, to create an environment that will endorse the development of engineered immune cells for the benefit of patients.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00262-015-1710-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
机译:半个多世纪前,第一次异体干细胞移植(allo-SCT)开始了细胞免疫治疗。几十年来,进展甚微,异源SCT的毒性仍然是主要挑战。然而,最近的突破为进一步发展这种方式开辟了新途径,并为遭受血液学或实体恶性肿瘤的患者提供了毒性更小,效率更高的干预措施。当前新颖的细胞免疫干预措施包括肿瘤浸润性免疫细胞的离体扩增和过继转移或拮抗耐受机制的药物的施用。备选地,被改造以表达确定的T细胞受体(TCR)和嵌合抗原受体(CAR)的免疫细胞的转移已显示出其潜力。通过对先天性免疫细胞如何攻击癌细胞而没有实质性副作用的了解,最近对“工程化”的适应性免疫有了重要的补充。这使得开发具有有限副作用的移植平台成为可能,从而允许早期免疫干预以及表达天然免疫受体的工程免疫细胞的设计。在这里,我们专注于先天性免疫干预及其与TCR和CAR工程免疫细胞的编排。此外,我们讨论了如何利用细胞免疫干预措施的全部潜力受到监管框架的影响。最后,我们重点介绍并讨论了与美国相比,欧洲当前临床试验领域的重大差异。目的是激发国际社会的努力,以支持监管机构和资助机构(尤其是在欧洲),以创造有利于工程化免疫细胞发展的环境,从而造福于患者。电子补充材料本文的在线版本(doi:10.1007) / s00262-015-1710-8)包含补充材料,授权用户可以使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号