首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Springer Open Choice >Feedback from Outcome Measures and Treatment Effectiveness Treatment Efficiency and Collaborative Practice: A Systematic Review
【2h】

Feedback from Outcome Measures and Treatment Effectiveness Treatment Efficiency and Collaborative Practice: A Systematic Review

机译:成果措施和治疗效果治疗效率以及协作实践的反馈:系统评价

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Due to recent increases in the use of feedback from outcome measures in mental health settings, we systematically reviewed evidence regarding the impact of feedback from outcome measures on treatment effectiveness, treatment efficiency, and collaborative practice. In over half of 32 studies reviewed, the feedback condition had significantly higher levels of treatment effectiveness on at least one treatment outcome variable. Feedback was particularly effective for not-on-track patients or when it was provided to both clinicians and patients. The findings for treatment efficiency and collaborative practice were less consistent. Given the heterogeneity of studies, more research is needed to determine when and for whom feedback is most effective.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10488-015-0710-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
机译:由于最近在心理健康环境中使用来自结果度量的反馈的增加,我们系统地审查了有关来自结果度量的反馈对治疗效果,治疗效率和协作实践的影响的证据。在超过32项研究的一半以上中,反馈条件对至少一个治疗结果变量具有显着较高的治疗效果。反馈对于不在正常轨道上的患者或同时提供给临床医生和患者特别有效。治疗效率和协作实践的发现不一致。鉴于研究的异质性,需要更多的研究来确定何时以及对谁反馈最有效。电子补充材料本文的在线版本(doi:10.1007 / s10488-015-0710-5)包含补充材料,可用于授权用户。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号