首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Springer Open Choice >Effectiveness of sequential intravenous-to-oral antibiotic switch therapy in hospitalized patients with gram-positive infection: the SEQUENCE cohort study
【2h】

Effectiveness of sequential intravenous-to-oral antibiotic switch therapy in hospitalized patients with gram-positive infection: the SEQUENCE cohort study

机译:序贯静脉-口服抗生素转换治疗对住院的革兰氏阳性感染患者的有效性:SEQUENCE队列研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Switching from intravenous to oral antibiotic therapy may improve inpatient management and reduce hospital stays and the complications of intravenous treatment. We aimed to assess the effectiveness of intravenous-to-oral antibiotic switch therapy and an early discharge algorithm in hospitalized patients with gram-positive infection. We performed a prospective cohort study with a retrospective comparison cohort, recruited from eight tertiary, acute-care Spanish referral hospitals. All patients included had culture-confirmed methicillin-resistant gram-positive infection, or methicillin-susceptible gram-positive infection and beta-lactam allergy and had received intravenous treatment with glycopeptides, lipopeptides, or linezolid. The study comprised two cohorts: the prospective cohort to assess the effectiveness of a sequential intravenous-to-oral antibiotic switch algorithm and early discharge, and a retrospective cohort in which the algorithm had not been applied, used as the comparator. A total of 247 evaluable patients were included; 115 in the prospective and 132 in the retrospective cohort. Forty-five retrospective patients (34 %) were not changed to oral antibiotics, and 87 (66 %) were changed to oral antibiotics without following the proposed algorithm. The duration of hospitalization was significantly shorter in the prospective cohort compared to the retrospective group that did not switch to oral drugs (16.7 ± 18.7 vs 23 ± 13.4 days, P  < 0.001). No differences were observed regarding the incidence of catheter-related bacteraemia (4.4 % vs 2.6 %, P = 0.621). Our results suggest that an intravenous-to-oral antibiotic switch strategy is effective for reducing the length of hospital stay in selected hospitalized patients with gram-positive infection.
机译:从静脉使用抗生素改为口服抗生素治疗可以改善住院管理,减少住院时间,减少静脉注射治疗的并发症。我们的目的是评估革兰氏阳性感染住院患者的静脉-口服抗生素转换治疗和早期出院算法的有效性。我们进行了一项回顾性比较队列的前瞻性队列研究,该队列是从西班牙八家三级急性护理转诊医院中招募的。纳入的所有患者均具有经培养证实的耐甲氧西林的革兰氏阳性感染,或耐甲氧西林的革兰氏阳性感染和β-内酰胺过敏,并接受糖肽,脂肽或利奈唑胺的静脉内治疗。该研究包括两个队列:评估连续静脉-口服抗生素转换算法和早期出院的有效性的前瞻性队列,以及未应用该算法的回顾性队列,作为比较对象。总共包括247位可评估的患者;前瞻性队列中有115名,回顾性队列中有132名。 45名回顾性患者(34%)未更改为口服抗生素,而87名(66%)患者未遵循建议的算法更改为口服抗生素。与不使用口服药物的回顾性组相比,前瞻性队列的住院时间显着缩短(16.7%±18.7天vs 23%±13.4天,P0.001 <0.001)。导管相关菌血症发生率未见差异(4.4%vs. 2.6%,P = 0.621)。我们的结果表明,静脉内-口服抗生素转换策略可有效减少选定的革兰氏阳性感染住院患者的住院时间。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号