首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Springer Open Choice >Is medicines parallel trade ‘regulatory arbitrage’?
【2h】

Is medicines parallel trade ‘regulatory arbitrage’?

机译:药品平行交易是否是监管套利?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Parallel trade (PT) is a phenomenon that takes place at the distribution level, when a patented product is diverted from the official distribution chain to another one where it competes as a parallel distributor. Although some research regards PT in Europe as a ‘common’ form of arbitrage, there are reasons to believe that it is a type of ‘regulatory arbitrage’ that does not necessarily produce equivalent welfare effects. We draw upon a unique dataset that contains source country records of parallel imported medicine sales to the Netherlands for one therapeutic group (statins), that accounts for 5 % of the market at the time of study and it faced no generic competition. We estimate precise differences in prices and statutory distribution margins for each source country/product and, examine whether they drive parallel import flows using a gravity specification and an instrumental variable strategy. Our findings reveal that parallel imports are driven by cross-country differences in statutory distribution margins in addition to price differences, consistently with the hypothesis of PT being a type of ‘regulatory arbitrage’.
机译:平行贸易(PT)是一种在分销级别上发生的现象,当一种专利产品从官方分销链转移到另一种产品时,在该产品中它作为并行分销商竞争。尽管一些研究将PT在欧洲视为一种“常见”套利形式,但有理由相信这是一种“监管套利”,并不一定会产生同等的福利效果。我们利用一个独特的数据集,其中包含一个治疗组(他汀类药物)向荷兰平行进口药品销售的原始国家/地区记录,在研究之时占其市场的5%,并且没有面临任何通用竞争。我们估算每种来源国/产品的价格和法定分配利润的精确差异,并使用引力指标和工具变量策略检查它们是否推动平行进口流量。我们的研究结果表明,平行进口是由除价格差异之外的法定分布利润率的跨国差异所驱动,这与PT的假设是“监管套利”的类型一致。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号