首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Springer Open Choice >Use and effectiveness of tocilizumab among patients with rheumatoid arthritis: an observational study from the British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register for rheumatoid arthritis
【2h】

Use and effectiveness of tocilizumab among patients with rheumatoid arthritis: an observational study from the British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register for rheumatoid arthritis

机译:类风湿关节炎患者中托西珠单抗的使用和效果:英国风湿病生物学学会对类风湿关节炎的观察研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The aims of the present study are to describe the characteristics of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients selected for tocilizumab (TCZ), compare the “real-world” effectiveness of TCZ and tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) when used as a first biologic and assess the influence of past biologic exposure/concurrent methotrexate (MTX) therapy on post-TCZ treatment outcomes. The British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register (BSRBR-RA) is a prospective cohort study following RA patients starting biologics in the UK. This includes patients starting TCZ as first or subsequent biologic, alongside biologic-naïve patients starting TNFi. Six-month disease activity and 1-year drug survival were compared between biologic-naïve patients starting TCZ versus TNFi and first-line versus subsequent TCZ users and TCZ users with MTX versus without using regression models adjusted by propensity score. Two hundred seventeen patients started TCZ, and 2419 started TNFi as first biologic. Seven hundred seventy-seven started TCZ after other biologics. First-line TCZ users had a higher prevalence of pulmonary fibrosis and cancer history than TNFi users. The first-line TCZ users were more likely to achieve DAS28 remission at 6 months than first-line TNFi, but other improvement markers were similar. The treatment response at 6 months was similar between subsequent-line TCZ users and first-line users after adjusting for baseline patient differences. Concurrent MTX use was not associated with treatment response in either first- or subsequent-line TCZ users. TCZ has been primarily used as subsequent-line biologic in the UK. When used as first line, the response appears similar to that observed in patients starting TNFi, suggesting that clinical response alone should not decide between initial biologic therapies.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10067-016-3485-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
机译:本研究的目的是描述被选为Tocilizumab(TCZ)的类风湿关节炎(RA)患者的特征,比较TCZ和肿瘤坏死因子抑制剂(TNFi)作为第一种生物制剂和药物时的“现实”有效性评估过去的生物暴露/并用甲氨蝶呤(MTX)治疗对TCZ后治疗结果的影响。英国风湿病生物学学会注册(BSRBR-RA)是一项前瞻性队列研究,是RA患者在英国开始使用生物制剂后进行的一项前瞻性队列研究。这包括以TCZ作为第一个或后续生物学药物的患者,以及没有TNFi药物的未接受过生物学治疗的患者。在未使用倾向评分调整后的回归模型的情况下,比较了初次使用TCZ与TNFi以及一线与随后的TCZ使用者以及具有MTX的TCZ使用者之间没有生物学反应的未曾接受过生物学治疗的患者的六个月疾病活动度和一年药物存活率。 217位患者开始使用TCZ,2419位患者开始使用TNFi作为第一个生物制剂。继其他生物制剂之后,有777个患者开始了TCZ。一线TCZ用户比TNFi用户具有更高的肺纤维化和癌症史患病率。一线TCZ用户比一线TNFi更可能在6个月达到DAS28缓解,但其他改善指标相似。调整基线患者差异后,后续一线TCZ用户和一线用户在6个月时的治疗反应相似。一线或后一线TCZ用户并发使用MTX与治疗反应无​​关。 TCZ在英国主要用作后代生物制剂。当用作一线药物时,反应似乎与开始TNFi的患者观察到的反应相似,这表明单独的临床反应不应决定最初的生物疗法之间的区别。电子补充材料本文的在线版本(doi:10.1007 / s10067-016-3485- 5)包含补充材料,授权用户可以使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号