首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Springer Open Choice >Does Intergenerational Educational Mobility Shape the Well-Being of Young Europeans? Evidence from the European Social Survey
【2h】

Does Intergenerational Educational Mobility Shape the Well-Being of Young Europeans? Evidence from the European Social Survey

机译:代际教育的流动性会影响年轻的欧洲人的幸福吗?欧洲社会调查的证据

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Using pooled European Social Survey data (Rounds 4–7, 2008–2014), we investigate the relationship between intergenerational educational mobility and subjective well-being (SWB) for young Europeans (N = 16,050 individuals aged 25–34 from 18 countries). Previous research has been struggling with inconclusive results due to the methodological challenge of disentangling the independent (i.e., ‘net’) effect of social mobility over and above the effects of social origin and destination. We contribute to this line of research by contrasting mobility effects estimated in a conventional linear regression framework with net mobility effects estimated by (non-linear) diagonal mobility models (DMM). We show how model selection influences estimates of mobility effects and how different specifications lead to radically different findings. Using DMM, we estimate how intergenerational educational mobility affects the SWB of young Europeans, differentiating between downward and upward mobility and different country groups. Our results suggest that status loss/gain across generations affects young adults’ SWB in addition to the level-effect of ending up in a lower/higher status position only in Continental Europe.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s11205-017-1753-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
机译:使用汇总的欧洲社会调查数据(2008年至2014年第4至7点),我们调查了年轻欧洲人(N = 18,050名年龄在25-34岁的18,050名来自16个国家的16,050个人)之间的代际教育流动与主观幸福感之间的关系。由于在解决社会流动的独立(即“净”)影响而不是社会出身和目的地影响方面的方法论挑战,以前的研究一直在努力寻找不确定的结果。我们通过将常规线性回归框架中估计的流动性影响与(非线性)对角流动性模型(DMM)估计的净流动性影响进行对比,为这一研究做出了贡献。我们展示了模型选择如何影响流动性影响的估计,以及不同的规格如何导致根本不同的发现。使用数字万用表,我们估算了代际教育流动性如何影响年轻的欧洲人的社会福利,从而区分了上下流动性和不同的国家/地区群体。我们的研究结果表明,跨代丧失/获得地位不仅影响仅在欧洲大陆处于较低/较高地位的成年人的水平效应。电子补充材料本文的在线版本(doi:10.1007 / s11205-017-1753-7)包含补充材料,授权用户可以使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号