首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Springer Open Choice >Impact of handwriting training on fluency spelling and text quality among third graders
【2h】

Impact of handwriting training on fluency spelling and text quality among third graders

机译:手写训练对三年级学生流利度拼写和文本质量的影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

As recent studies and theoretical assumptions suggest that the quality of texts composed by children and adolescents is affected by their transcription skills, this experimental field trial aims at investigating the impact of combined handwriting/spelling training on fluency, spelling and text quality among normally developing 3rd graders (N = 175). In addition to the combined handwriting/spelling training group, the sample includes two other intervention groups, a handwriting training group and a spelling training group as well as a reading fluency training control group. The participating teachers (N = 11) and their students were randomly assigned to the different intervention and control conditions, which were scheduled to last 20 units (each unit lasts 15 min) distributed over 5 weeks (4 units/week). Data collection was administered both before (pre-test) and after (post-test) the intervention as well as 3 months later (follow-up). Measures included group-administered tests and tasks (spelling, visuo-motor integration, copy task, and composing) and individually administered tests and tasks (working memory and several handwriting tasks on the digitizing tablet). As handwriting automaticity (measured on the digitizing tablet) was already high at the beginning of the study, the intervention was not able to improve it further. In consequence, an intervention effect on the quality of composed texts was not observed. Instead, text quality was predicted by working memory, fluency, spelling, and gender irrespective of the intervention.
机译:由于最近的研究和理论假设表明,儿童和青少年撰写的文本的质量会受到其转录技巧的影响,因此该实验性田间试验旨在调查手写/拼写训练相结合对正常发展的第三语言的流利度,拼写和文本质量的影响年级(N = 175)。除了组合的手写/拼写训练组之外,该样本还包括另外两个干预组:手写训练组和拼写训练组以及阅读流利度训练对照组。参与的老师(N = 11)和他们的学生被随机分配到不同的干预和控制条件下,计划持续5个星期(4个单元/周)持续20个单元(每个单元持续15分钟)。在干预前(测试前)和干预后(测试后)以及3个月后(随访)进行数据收集。措施包括小组管理的测试和任务(拼写,可视化马达集成,复制任务和作文)以及单独管理的测试和任务(工作记忆和数字化平板电脑上的几个手写任务)。由于在研究开始时手写自动化程度(在数字化平板电脑上进行了测量)已经很高,因此该干预措施无法进一步改善它。结果,未观察到对撰写文本质量的干预效果。而是通过工作记忆,流利程度,拼写和性别来预测文本质量,而与干预无关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号