首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Springer Open Choice >Volcano alert level systems: managing the challenges of effective volcanic crisis communication
【2h】

Volcano alert level systems: managing the challenges of effective volcanic crisis communication

机译:火山警报级别系统:管理有效的火山危机沟通所面临的挑战

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Over the last four decades, volcano observatories have adopted a number of different communication strategies for the dissemination of information on changes in volcanic behaviour and potential hazards to a wide range of user groups. These commonly include a standardised volcano alert level system (VALS), used in conjunction with other uni-valent communication techniques (such as information statements, reports and maps) and multi-directional techniques (such as meetings and telephone calls). This research, based on interviews and observation conducted 2007–2009 at the five US Geological Survey (USGS) volcano observatories, and including some of the key users of the VALS, argues for the importance of understanding how communicating volcanic hazard information takes place as an everyday social practice, focusing on the challenges of working across the boundaries between the scientific and decision-making communities. It is now widely accepted that the effective use, value and deployment of information across science-policy interfaces of this kind depend on three criteria: the scientific credibility of the information, its relevance to the needs of stakeholders and the legitimacy of both the information and the processes that produced it. Translation and two-way communication are required to ensure that all involved understand what information is credible and relevant. Findings indicate that whilst VALS play a role in raising awareness of an unfolding situation, supplementary communication techniques are crucial in facilitating situational understanding of that situation, and the uncertainties inherent to its scientific assessment, as well as in facilitating specific responses. In consequence, ‘best practice’ recommendations eschew further standardisation, and focus on the in situ cultivation of dialogue between scientists and stakeholders as a means of ensuring that information, and the processes through which it is produced are perceived to be legitimate by all involved.
机译:在过去的四十年中,火山观测站采用了许多不同的通信策略,以向广泛的用户群体传播有关火山行为变化和潜在危害的信息。这些通常包括标准化的火山警报级别系统(VALS),与其他单价通信技术(例如信息声明,报告和地图)和多向技术(例如会议和电话)结合使用。这项研究基于2007年至2009年在五个美国地质调查局(USGS)火山观测站进行的采访和观察,并包括VALS的一些主要用户,该研究提出了理解如何将火山灾害信息作为交流手段进行交流的重要性。日常的社会实践,重点关注跨科学界和决策界之间的挑战。现已广泛接受的是,跨这种科学与政策互动的信息的有效使用,价值和部署取决于三个标准:信息的科学可信性,与利益相关者需求的相关性以及信息和信息的合法性。产生它的过程。需要进行翻译和双向交流,以确保所有相关人员都了解哪些信息是可信的和相关的。研究结果表明,虽然VALS在提高对正在发生的情况的认识中起着作用,但是补充交流技术对于促进对这种情况的情境理解,其科学评估所固有的不确定性以及促进具体应对措施至关重要。因此,“最佳实践”建议避免了进一步的标准化,并着重于科学家和利益相关者之间的原地培养对话,以确保所有参与者都认为该信息及其产生过程是合法的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号