首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Springer Open Choice >Efficacy of Invasive and Non-Invasive Brain Modulation Interventions for Addiction
【2h】

Efficacy of Invasive and Non-Invasive Brain Modulation Interventions for Addiction

机译:有创和无创脑调节干预对成瘾的功效

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

It is important to find new treatments for addiction due to high relapse rates despite current interventions and due to expansion of the field with non-substance related addictive behaviors. Neuromodulation may provide a new type of treatment for addiction since it can directly target abnormalities in neurocircuits. We review literature on five neuromodulation techniques investigated for efficacy in substance related and behavioral addictions: transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), (repetitive) transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), EEG, fMRI neurofeedback and deep brain stimulation (DBS) and additionally report on effects of these interventions on addiction-related cognitive processes. While rTMS and tDCS, mostly applied at the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, show reductions in immediate craving for various addictive substances, placebo-responses are high and long-term outcomes are understudied. The lack in well-designed EEG-neurofeedback studies despite decades of investigation impedes conclusions about its efficacy. Studies investigating fMRI neurofeedback are new and show initial promising effects on craving, but future trials are needed to investigate long-term and behavioral effects. Case studies report prolonged abstinence of opioids or alcohol with ventral striatal DBS but difficulties with patient inclusion may hinder larger, controlled trials. DBS in neuropsychiatric patients modulates brain circuits involved in reward processing, extinction and negative-reinforcement that are also relevant for addiction. To establish the potential of neuromodulation for addiction, more randomized controlled trials are needed that also investigate treatment duration required for long-term abstinence and potential synergy with other addiction interventions. Finally, future advancement may be expected from tailoring neuromodulation techniques to specific patient (neurocognitive) profiles.
机译:尽管存在当前的干预措施,但由于复发率高,并且由于与非物质相关的成瘾行为领域的扩大,找到新的成瘾治疗方法非常重要。神经调节可以直接针对神经回路异常,因此可以提供一种新型的成瘾治疗方法。我们回顾了有关在物质相关和行为成瘾方面研究的五种神经调节技术的文献:经颅直流电刺激(tDCS),(重复)经颅磁刺激(rTMS),EEG,fMRI神经反馈和深部脑刺激(DBS),并报告了这些干预措施对成瘾相关的认知过程的影响。尽管rTMS和tDCS主要应用于背外侧前额叶皮层,显示出对各种成瘾性物质的即时渴望减少,但安慰剂反应较高,长期结果尚待研究。尽管进行了数十年的研究,但缺乏精心设计的EEG神经反馈研究阻碍了有关其疗效的结论。研究功能磁共振成像神经反馈的研究是新的,并且显示出对渴望的最初有希望的影响,但是还需要进一步的试验来研究长期和行为的影响。案例研究报告,腹侧纹状体DBS禁食阿片类药物或酒精的时间延长,但患者入选困难可能会阻碍较大的对照试验。神经精神病患者的DBS调节参与奖励处理,消光和负强化的大脑回路,这也与成瘾有关。为了确定神经调节对成瘾的潜力,还需要更多的随机对照试验来研究长期禁欲和与其他成瘾干预措施的潜在协同作用所需的治疗时间。最后,通过调整神经调节技术以适应特定患者(神经认知)特征,可以期待未来的发展。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号